Monoclonal gammopathies and kidney: a diagnostic challenge without any clues

Abstract

Diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) with histopathologic features of proliferative GN with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID) is a challenge for clinicians because of the absence of laboratory findings suggestive of glomerular involvement in paraproteinemia. Renal biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of PGNMID because it is a monoclonal gammopathy with kidney damage often “without a detectable serum/urine clone”. Through this case report, we want to focus on the complexity both in the diagnostic process and in monitoring the renal-hematological response to therapy.

 

Keywords: monoclonal gammopathies, nephrotoxic paraproteins, kidney damage

Sorry, this entry is only available in Italian.

Introduzione

La gammopatia monoclonale è definita dalla presenza di una immunoglobulina monoclonale o da una parte di essa (catene leggere o pesanti libere, FLC o FHC) nel plasma, nelle urine o in entrambi, prodotta in genere da plasmacellule clonali o, meno comunemente, da B linfociti [1].

Le paraproteinemie sono state classificate, per decenni, in base a due criteri ematologici: 1. massa o burden di proliferazione clonale e 2. presenza di danno d’organo, quest’ultima, conditio sine qua non per l’avvio al trattamento ematologico. Nelle condizioni maligne, come il mieloma multiplo (MM), in cui entrambi i criteri sono soddisfatti, è indicato il trattamento [2]. I disordini clonali di piccola entità non associati a danno d’organo (vedi Tabella I) sono considerati benigni o pre-maligni, da osservare longitudinalmente [2].

Disordine plasmacellulare Criteri diagnostici
IgM MGUS
  • Proteina M sierica IgM <3 g/dl
  • Non evidenza di anemia, sintomi costituzionali, iperviscosità, linfoadenomegalia, epatosplenomegalia o altro danno d’organo
  • Infiltrazione linfoplasmocitica midollare <10%
Light chain MGUS
  • Anormale rapporto FLC (<0.26 o >1.65)
  • Aumentato livello di FLC k (ratio >1.65) o FLC ƛ (ratio <0.26)
  • Assenza di danno d’organo (CRAB) o amiloidosi
  • Clone plasmacellulare midollare <10%
  • Proteine monoclonali urinarie <500 mg/24 ore
non-IgM MGUS
  • Proteina M sierica (non IgM) <3 g/dL
  • Clone plasmacellulare midollare <10%
  • Assenza di danno d’organo, in particolare CRAB o amiloidosi
Mieloma multiplo smoldering

Entrambi i criteri da soddisfare:

  • Proteina M sierica (IgG o IgA) ≳3 g/dL o  urinaria ≳500 mg/24 ore e/o clone plasmacellulare midollare 10-60%
  • Assenza di MDEs o di amiloidosi
Tabella I: Criteri diagnostici e classificazione delle gammopatie monoclonali [2]. FLC= free light chains. CRAB= hyperCalcemia, renal insufficiency, anaemia, bone lesions. MDEs= myeloma-defining events

Fino a qualche anno fa non esisteva una entità nosologica che spiegasse la presenza di un danno renale associato ad un clone plasmacellulare apparentemente non patogeno, i “dangerous small clones” [34].

Nel 2012 l’IKMG (Gruppo di ricerca internazionale di rene e gammopatia monoclonale) ha coniato la definizione di MGRS (gammopatia monoclonale a significato renale), aggiornata successivamente nel 2017 [56]. La MGRS rappresenta ogni disordine clonale B o plasmacellulare che produce una immunoglobulina monoclonale nefrotossica che direttamente o indirettamente causa un insulto o danno renale ma che non soddisfa i criteri correnti per l’immediato trattamento (Tabella II) [6]. I pazienti che ne sono affetti necessitano, quindi, di essere trattati come se avessero un disordine clonale maligno [7].

Disordine plasmacellulare Definizione (aggiornata nel 2017)
MGRS

Ogni disordine linfoproliferativo clonale B cellulare o plasmacellulare che possiede due caratteristiche:

  • Una o più lesioni renali riconducibili ad un danno da immunoglobuline monoclonali
  • Dal punto di vista ematologico, non richiede terapia
Tabella II: Definizione di MGRS [6]

Nelle MGRS sono le caratteristiche chimico-fisiche delle MIg o delle FLC nefropatogene a conferire loro patogenicità [8]. La classificazione delle forme di MGRS, oltre che sui meccanismi patogenetici, si basa sulla presenza o meno di depositi monoclonali e sulle caratteristiche ultrastrutturali di questi ultimi: organizzati e non organizzati (Figura 1) [36910].

Figura 1: Classificazione istopatologica [6]. Ig= immunoglobulin. GN= glomerulonephritis. LCPT= light-chain proximal tubulopathy. MIDD= monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease
Figura 1: Classificazione istopatologica [6]. Ig= immunoglobulin. GN= glomerulonephritis. LCPT= light-chain proximal tubulopathy. MIDD= monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease
Nell’ambito delle MGRS con depositi monoclonali non organizzati si colloca la Glomerulonefrite proliferativa con depositi di immunoglobuline monoclonali (PGNMID) che, nel 2009, fu descritta per la prima volta da Nasr come una rara malattia renale a depositi non organizzati di MIg che mimava una glomerulonefrite da immunocomplessi [1112]. La PGNMID rappresenta una sfida diagnostica in quanto solo il 30% dei pazienti affetti presenta una componente monoclonale sierica e in 3 pazienti su 4 il riscontro di monoclonalità è solo su tessuto renale [13].

Descriviamo qui il caso clinico di un paziente affetto da PGNMID il cui processo diagnostico, arduo per l’assenza di indizi che orientassero verso una forma paraproteina-relata, ha trovato la sua svolta, del tutto inaspettata, nell’esito della biopsia renale.

Questo caso clinico mette in luce le difficoltà diagnostiche della PGNMID che immancabilmente, ritroviamo nella fase di monitoraggio della risposta nefro-ematologica.

 

Caso clinico

Si tratta di un uomo di 72 anni, ricoverato nella nostra U.O. nell’ottobre 2016 per inquadramento diagnostico di una insufficienza renale rapidamente evolutiva.

In anamnesi: fattori di rischio cardiovascolari quali ipertensione arteriosa di lunga data in terapia con Ace inibitore; dislipidemia in terapia con Lovastatina; due interventi chirurgici: TURP per verosimile IPB ed ernioplastica inguinale; normofunzione renale.

Il primo episodio di AKI (creatinina 1.7-2 mg/dL) datava a tre mesi prima, in luglio, in occasione di un accesso in Pronto Soccorso per ritenzione urinaria acuta risoltasi dopo posizionamento di catetere vescicale. In quell’occasione il paziente aveva avuto un “blocco intestinale” trattato con clistere evacuativo con esito positivo.

Circa 2 settimane prima quell’episodio, il paziente aveva presentato una reazione allergica con rash diffuso, a seguito dell’assunzione di macrolide per una faringodinia associata a malessere generale; in quella occasione non aveva eseguito esami di laboratorio.

Ripetuti gli esami inerenti la funzione renale nei mesi successivi (agosto e settembre) si confermava il danno renale ingravescente (creatinina 2.57-3 mg/dl), per cui il paziente afferiva al nostro Reparto di Nefrologia. 

Ricovero

All’ingresso il paziente era in ottime condizioni cliniche generali, con perfetto controllo pressorio (PA 120/60 mmHg); l’esame obiettivo era negativo per reperti patologici.

Gli esami di laboratorio (Tabella III) confermavano il danno renale di grado moderato-severo associato ad una proteinuria di lieve entità, in parte tubulare, con una lieve microalbuminuria e sedimento nefritico. Si confermava la dislipidemia mista e, in aggiunta, l’iperuricemia. La glicemia era nella norma. All’emocromo: anemia normocitica e normocromica con assetto marziale e LDH nella norma; assenti alterazioni della formula leucocitaria e piastrine normali.

Gli esami immunologici ed il Rast test per alimenti, acari, derivati di animali, pollini e farmaci (Ampicillina e Amoxicillina) erano negativi; IgE aumentate; PSA totale lievemente superiore ai limiti della norma con un PSA free normale.

Hb: 10 mg/dL Ferro: 111 mcg/dL
MCV: 84 fL Ferritina: 195 ng/mL
Creatinina: 2.32 mg/dL

Clearance misurata creatinina: 29.4 ml/min

Proteinuria: 225 mg/die glomerulare non selettiva

Alfa 1 microglobulina urine: 25.1 mg/L

UACR (urinary albumin-creatinine ratio): 69 mg/g

Colesterolo totale: 226 mg/dL Acido urico: 8.4 mg/dL
LDL: 154 mg/dl

Trigliceridi: 236 mg/dL

Glucosio: 88 mg/dL
C3/C4: 131/40 mg/dL

ANA: <1:80

ANCA: negativi

Ab anti cardiolipina IgG/IgM: 4/2 U/mL

IgG/IgA/IgM: 1307/268/119 mg/dL

IgE: 212 UI/mL

Immunofissazione sierica ed urinaria: negativa

FLC sieriche: kappa 49.4 mg/L, lambda 25.8 mg/L, ratio 1.91

Tabella III: Esami di laboratorio al momento del ricovero

L’ecografia documentava reni morfologicamente normali per dimensioni, spessore corticale e differenziazione cortico-midollare, alcune cisti bilateralmente, non idronefrosi; arterie renali principali regolarmente pervie, IR intraparenchimali aumentati (0.75), vene renali pervie; prostata con ipertrofia del lobo medio (diametro trasverso 35 mm).

I dati anamnestici e laboratoristici consentivano di formulare diverse ipotesi diagnostiche (nefropatia ostruttiva? nefrite interstiziale acuta?), che necessitavano di una conferma mediante biopsia renale.

Biopsia renale

La microscopia ottica (MO) mostrava: 18 glomeruli (3 in sclerosi globale), ipercellularità endocapillare moderata ed essudazione di polimorfonucleati, iperplasia podocitaria. Comparto tubulo-interstiziale: atrofia/fibrosi (2+); cilindri tubulari sia ialini che ematici (1+), pleiomorfismo nucleare. Vasi: fibrosi intimale a carico delle arterie (3+), indenni le arteriole (Figura 2).

All’immunofluorescenza (IF) si rilevavano: 9 glomeruli sede di depositi di IgG (3+) e catene leggere kappa (2+) con pattern di deposizione diffuso e globale, lineare e parietale lungo le pareti capillari (Figura 3 e 4).

Alla microscopia elettronica non erano presenti glomeruli.

Figura 2: MO (colorazione PAS) ipercellularità endocapillare moderata ed essudazione di polimorfonucleati, iperplasia podocitaria. Comparto tubulo-interstiziale: atrofia/fibrosi (2+)
Figura 2: MO (colorazione PAS) ipercellularità endocapillare moderata ed essudazione di polimorfonucleati, iperplasia podocitaria. Comparto tubulo-interstiziale: atrofia/fibrosi (2+)
Figura 3: IF depositi IgG (3+) lungo le anse capillari con pattern diffuso, globale, lineare
Figura 3: IF depositi IgG (3+) lungo le anse capillari con pattern diffuso, globale, lineare
Figura 4: IF depositi di catene leggere kappa (2+) lungo le anse capillari con pattern diffuso, globale, lineare
Figura 4: IF depositi di catene leggere kappa (2+) lungo le anse capillari con pattern diffuso, globale, lineare

Tale quadro deponeva per una glomerulonefrite proliferativa endocapillare focale con deposizione monoclonale di IgG e catene leggere kappa (PGNMID). Concomitavano lesioni croniche sia tubulo-interstiziali che vascolari.

Alla luce del riscontro istologico di un coinvolgimento renale da deposizione parenchimale di depositi monoclonali IgG Kappa, si rendeva necessaria l’esecuzione della biopsia osteomidollare (BOM) che rivelava componente plasmacellulare midollare 2% con lieve sbilanciamento kappa/lambda.

In accordo con gli Ematologi veniva avviata una terapia specifica mirata alla soppressione del clone plasmacellulare (6 cicli di Bortezomib-Ciclofosfamide-Desametasone), interrotta per gravi complicanze cerebro e cardiovascolari (sindrome coronarica acuta ed ictus emorragico cerebellare).

Alla terapia ematologica specifica veniva affiancata quella di supporto, volta alla correzione dei fattori di progressione del danno renale cronico (ipolipemizzante, antipertensiva), nonché antiproteinurica (Ace-i). Veniva, inoltre, effettuato un follow-up clinico-laboratoristico combinato nefro-ematologico, in regime ambulatoriale.

A distanza di 5 anni si è osservata stabilità del quadro reno-ematologico (Tabella IV).

Hb 13 g/dL
creatinina 2,2 mg/dL
proteinuria 143 mg/die
FLC sieriche:
kappa 43,6
lambda 24
ratio 1,82
Immunofissazione siero ed urine negativa
Tabella IV: Esami di laboratorio dopo 5 anni di follow-up

 

Discussione

Il nostro paziente si presentava con un danno renale acuto ingravescente di difficile interpretazione eziologica. Inizialmente i dati anamnestici ci hanno orientato verso una nefropatia su base ostruttiva, in considerazione del primo episodio di AKI in presenza di anuria.

Nessun dato immunologico supportava una eziologia immuno-mediata del danno renale. Successivamente abbiamo ipotizzato una nefrite tubulo-interstiziale acuta su base immuno-allergica, in considerazione della reazione allergica che aveva preceduto il primo riscontro di alterazione funzionale renale.

Gli esami laboratoristici mirati alla ricerca di una paraproteina (immunofissazione sierica ed urinaria, FLC ratio) risultavano negativi.

Come anche nel nostro caso clinico, nella PGNMID è assai difficile rilevare una componente monoclonale (presente solo nel 30% dei casi) mediante elettroforesi sierica, immunofissazione sierica ed urinaria, FLC ratio [14].

La biopsia renale, che è obbligatoria nei quadri di danno renale acuto o cronico ad eziologia non chiara nel nostro caso ha rivelato, inaspettatamente, una glomerulonefrite proliferativa endocapillare focale a depositi monoclonali (IgG kappa).

La biopsia osteo-midollare, eseguita in un secondo momento, è un passaggio necessario nell’algoritmo diagnostico di una nefropatia a depositi monoclonali, ed ha confermato si trattasse di una forma MGRS, data la presenza di un clone plasmacellulare <10% sbilanciato per catene leggere kappa.

Nella PGNMID il danno renale avviene tipicamente per deposizione glomerulare di immunoglobuline intatte (MIg) a isotipo IgG, con restrizione clonale della catena leggera, di solito kappa (73% dei casi) [14]. Sono descritti in letteratura casi meno comuni di PGNMID-LC, in cui i depositi clonali sono costituiti da sole FLC, o di PGNMID a isotipo IgA o IgM (circa il 10% dei casi) [15]. Il pattern istopatologico più frequente (2/3 casi) è quello membrano-proliferativo, seguito dalla forma proliferativa endocapillare (20-35% dei casi), che abbiamo diagnosticato nel nostro paziente, e dalla mesangio-proliferativa pura (3-13% dei casi) [13]. Esistono, poi, forme rare non proliferative, tra cui il pattern membranoso con restrizione clonale dei depositi (5% dei casi) [16].

La diagnosi della PGNMID si basa sulla presenza, alla immunofluorescenza, di depositi limitati al glomerulo, a sede mesangiale e lungo le anse capillari con pattern granulare di IgG e quasi sempre di C3, meno comunemente di C1q [13]. Importante, ai fini della diagnosi, è caratterizzare la sottoclasse di IgG, poiché si tratta di IgG monotipiche (IgG3). Nel nostro caso ciò non è stato possibile per indisponibilità del reagente nel nostro laboratorio.

La microscopia elettronica, strumento essenziale nella diagnosi differenziale, consente di discriminare tali depositi “non organizzati” dalle forme a depositi organizzati di tipo microtubulare (GN immunotattoide e GN crioglobulinemica tipo 1), molto simili per caratteristiche morfologiche in MO e IF ma diverse per presentazione clinica e prognosi. Nel nostro caso non è stata condotta l’indagine ultrastrutturale per assenza di glomeruli, tuttavia il quadro istologico in microscopia ottica ed immunofluorescenza, l’esordio clinico limitato al rene e l’assenza di una CM sierica ed urinaria sono stati sufficienti alla diagnosi conclusiva di PGNMID.

In accordo con gli Ematologi è stata intrapresa una terapia con agenti anti-Mieloma (Bortezomib based regimen), poiché il clone documentato su tessuto renale era di tipo IgG. Di fatto, quando il clone è tipo IgM il regime terapeutico di scelta si basa su anticorpi monoclonali anti CD20 diretti contro un precursore clonale B linfocellulare [17].

La decisione di intraprendere una terapia ematologica mirata a sopprimere il clone produttore di MIg nefrotossiche si basa su una valutazione olistica, che tiene conto della fragilità del paziente, delle sue comorbidità e dell’entità del danno renale cronico in termini di fibrosi tubulo-interstiziale e di glomerulosclerosi. Le MGRS sono, infatti, condizioni non fatali, la cui terapia è volta a preservare la funzione renale, lì dove in condizioni sistemiche come la AL amiloidosi la terapia è invece salvavita [7]. Nello specifico della PGNMID l’indicazione ad iniziare una terapia aggressiva riguarda i casi di sindrome nefrosica, flare nefritico, GFR <20 ml/min ed eleggibilità a trapianto di rene, nonché in quelli con rapido declino della funzione renale, come nel nostro paziente.

Da quanto emerge dai pochi dati riportati in letteratura, che includono casistiche limitate, la chemioterapia (Rituximab/Bortezomib) adattata al clone sottostante o, in assenza di un clone documentabile, impostata empiricamente, consente di ottenere un recupero funzionale renale [1718].

Nel nostro caso clinico, il follow-up a 5 anni ha documentato una assoluta stabilità sia sul piano ematologico che su quello nefrologico, in termini di filtrato glomerulare e proteinuria/24 ore, nonostante il paziente non abbia concluso i cicli di chemioterapia.

In assenza di un clone identificabile, il monitoraggio della risposta renale ed ematologica risulta complesso, poichè si basa sulle variazioni del filtrato glomerulare, della proteinuria 24 ore (parametri che possono però essere influenzati da altri fattori eziologici), sul FLC ratio.

In conclusione, la PGNMID rappresenta una sfida sia diagnostica che terapeutica. Sarebbe pertanto auspicabile la ricerca di nuove tecniche diagnostiche per rilevare i piccoli cloni nefropatogeni e di nuovi marcatori di risposta terapeutica.

 

Bibliografia

  1. Leung N, Bridoux F, Nasr SH. Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance. N Engl J Med 2021 May 20; 384(20):1931-41. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1810907
  2. Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2014 Nov; 15(12):e538-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5
  3. Bridoux F, et al. Diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. Kidney intern 2015 Apr; 87(4):698-711. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2014.408
  4. Merlini G, Stone MJ. Dangerous small B-cell clones. Blood 2006 Oct 15; 108(8):2520-30. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-03-001164
  5. Leung N, Bridoux F, Hutchison CA, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: when MGUS is no longer undetermined or insignificant. Blood 2012 Nov 22; 120(22):4292-95. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-07-445304
  6. Leung N, Bridoux F, Batuman V, et al. The evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: a consensus report of the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group. Nat Rev Nephrol 2019 Jan; 15(1):45-59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-018-0077-4
  7. Fermand JP, Bridoux F, Kyle RA, et al. How I treat monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS). Blood 2013 Nov 21; 122(22):3583-90. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-05-495929
  8. Basnayake K, Stringer SJ, Hutchison CA, Cockwell P. The biology of immunoglobulin free light chains and kidney injury. Kidney Int 2011 Jun; 79(12):1289-301. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.94
  9. Leung N, Drosou ME, Nasr SH. Dysproteinemias and Glomerular Disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018 Jan 6; 13(1):128-39. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00560117
  10. Sethi S, Fervenza FC, Rajkumar SV. Spectrum of manifestations of monoclonal gammopathy-associated renal lesions. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2016 Mar; 25(2):127-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNH.0000000000000201
  11. Nasr SH, Satoskar A, Markowitz GS, et al. Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009 Sep; 20(9):2055-64. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2009010110
  12. Nasr SH, Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, et al. Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits: a distinct entity mimicking immune-complex glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 2004 Jan; 65(1):85-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00365.x
  13. Bhutani G, Nasr SH, Said SM, et al. Hematologic characteristics of proliferative glomerulonephrities with nonorganized monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits. Mayo Clin Proc 2015 May; 90(5):587-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.01.024
  14. Bridoux F, Javaugue V, Nasr SH, Leung N. Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits: a nephrologist perspective. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021 Jan 25; 36(2):208-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfz176
  15. Nasr SH, Larsen CP, Sirac C, et al. Light chain only variant of proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits is associated with a high detection rate of the pathogenic plasma cell clone. Kidney Int 2020 Mar; 97(3):589-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2019.10.025
  16. Komatsuda A, Masai R, Ohtani H, et al. Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease associated with membranous features. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008 Dec; 23(12):3888-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfn363
  17. Gumber R, Cohen JB, Palmer MB, et al. A clone-directed approach may improve diagnosis and treatment of proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits. Kidney Int 2018 Jul; 94(1):199-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.02.020
  18. Guiard E, Karras A, Plaisier E, et al. Patterns of noncryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis with monoclonal Ig deposits: correlation with IgG subclass and response to rituximab. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011 Jul; 6(7):1609-16. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.10611110

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis complicated with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in a young man who is a healthy cyclist

Abstract

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), formerly known as Churg-Strauss syndrome, is a rare systemic vasculitis. Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) is a rare complication of EGPA. We report a case of a 60-year-old man, who is also a skilled cyclist, who was hospitalized to investigate a symptomatology that had arisen over the previous months and worsened in the last few weeks, to the point of limiting normal everyday activities. The physical examination revealed the presence of livedo reticularis of the four limbs, purpura of the lower limbs, arthritis of the ankles, and low-grade fever; the patient showed intense asthenia, loss of appetite, retrosternal heartburn, and a scarcely pharmacologically controlled asthma. He also reported weight loss (about 5 kg in the last 6 months). Rapidly progressing renal failure was observed with hyper-eosinophilia (4.7 thousand/μL eosinophils, 44% of total leukocytes), pulmonary opacities on chest computed tomography (CT), and sinusitis on CT of the facial massif. The search for antibodies directed against neutrophil cytoplasm (ANCA) revealed a high level of pANCA (pANCA ++, ELISA anti-MPO 666 UI/ml), associated with an increment of inflammation indicators. The induction therapy was high-dosage intravenous glucorticoids and cyclophosphamide, to improve the short and long-term prognosis. After 7 months of treatment, the patient reported a considerable improvement of the symptoms, which at that point did not necessitate pharmacological interventions. The eosinophils value was 0 cells/mm³, the inflammation indexes were back to the norm, and the renal function appeared significantly improved.

Keywords: eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, Churg-Strauss Syndrome, rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis

Introduction

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), formerly known as Churg-Strauss syndrome, is a rare systemic vasculitis of unknown etiology, which is typically characterized by bronchial asthma, significant eosinophilia, and necrotizing vasculitis [1]. EGPA has three progressive phases: a prodromal allergic phase, such as bronchial asthma and rhinosinusitis; an eosinophilic phase; a vasculitis phase. The American College of Rheumatology published the following six clinical criteria for the diagnosis of EGPA: asthma, eosinophilia >10% in a differential white blood cell count, mononeuropathy or polyneuropathy, transient pulmonary opacities on chest X-ray, paranasal sinus abnormality, and a biopsy specimen containing a blood vessel showing eosinophil infiltration in the extravascular areas [2]. The presence of four or more of these 6 clinical criteria yields a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 99.7% for EGPA. After the diagnosis, we started an induction therapy based on glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide, as suggested by KDIGO guidelines [3], achieving clinical remission.

 

Clinical case

In February 2021 a 60-year-old man, who is also a skilled cyclist, was admitted to the Nephrology department of the San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital (Tivoli) to investigate a symptomatology that had arisen over the previous months and worsened in the last few weeks, to the point of limiting normal everyday activities. After consulting various specialists, ASA-intolerance syndrome was diagnosed by an allergologist. In December 2020, due to the worsening clinical conditions, he was hospitalized in the General Medicine ward of Subiaco Hospital. Following acute kidney injury, a renal consult was required, and the patient was transferred to the Nephrology ward in Tivoli’s Hospital. Physical examination revealed the presence of livedo reticularis of the four limbs, purpura of the lower limbs, arthritis of the ankles, and low-grade fever; the patient showed intense asthenia, loss of appetite, retrosternal heartburn, hypoesthesia of the right lower limb and a scarcely pharmacologically controlled asthma. He also reported weight loss (about 5 kg in the last 6 months). In anamnesis, we found two recent episodes of severe bronchospasm, which had led him to access the nearest emergency room.

Blood chemistry tests, summarized in Table I, and diagnostic investigations revealed a rapidly progressing renal failure, hyper-eosinophilia (4.7 thousand/μL eosinophils, 44% of total leukocytes), pulmonary opacities on chest computed tomography (CT) (Figure 1), and sinusitis of the paranasal sinuses, with abundant inflammatory tissue in the paranasal sinuses visible on CT of the facial massif (Figure 2). Two consecutive nasopharyngeal swab tests (PCR, confirming SARSCoV-2 infection) were negative, as were HIV antibodies.

Figure 1: CT scan. 1A) Scan at the time of hospitalization: non-segmental peripheral and peri-bronchovascular consolidation with opacities and pleural connecting striae in the middle lobe and in the basal lobe of the lungs; 1B) Scan at the end of the induction phase: full resolution of the disease
Figure 1: CT scan. 1A) Scan at the time of hospitalization: non-segmental peripheral and peri-bronchovascular consolidation with opacities and pleural connecting striae in the middle lobe and in the basal lobe of the lungs; 1B) Scan at the end of the induction phase: full resolution of the disease
Figure 2: CT scan of the facial massif for the study of the paranasal sinuses. 2A) Scan at the time of hospitalization: mucosal thickening in the paranasal sinuses on both sides, predominantly on the right; 2B) Scan at the end of the induction phase: complete resolution of the disease.
Figure 2: CT scan of the facial massif for the study of the paranasal sinuses. 2A) Scan at the time of hospitalization: mucosal thickening in the paranasal sinuses on both sides, predominantly on the right; 2B) Scan at the end of the induction phase: complete resolution of the disease.
  Before hospital admission During recovery, before the start of induction therapy During recovery, after the start of induction therapy During follow up
DAYS 12.7.2020 12.27.2020 12.28.2020 2.1.2021 2.5.2021 2.14.2021 2.18.2021 3.16.2021 4.12.2021 5.19.2021 7.12.2021 9.16.2021 10.21.2021
WBC (cells³/mm³) 13,1 12,8 11,8 14,7 12,5 10,3 11,2 7,5 8,8 9,1 8 8,1 7.6
Lymphocytes (cells/mm³) 0,8 0,7 0,9 1,6 0,7 1,9 0,8 0,6 1 1,2 1 1,1 0.7
Neutrophils (cells/mm³) 9,4 8,5 6,6 5,8 1,17 7,4 9,9 6,6 7,1 7,4 6,5 6,5 6.6
Eosinophils (cells/mm³) 1,7 2,8 3,5 6,4 0 0,1 0 0 0,1 0 0 0 0
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 13,4 12,9 12,1 12,8 12,5 13,7 12,8 13 13,4 14,5 13,8 14,5 15
Proteinuria 30 mg/dl 1,46 gr/24h 100 mg/dl 1,84 gr/24h 2 gr/24h 1,7 gr/24 h 0,9 gr/24h <150 mg/24 h
sCreatinine (mg/dl) 0,99 1,91 2,17 1,9 1,97 1,37 1,23 1,2 1,19 1,26 1,2 1,1 1.1
Total sProtein(g/dl) 5,4 6,3 6,1 5,2 5,5 5,7 6.1
Alpha2 (g/dl) 0,87 0,74 0,72 0,7 0,7 0,7 0.75
Gamma globulin (g/dl) 0,8 1,38 1,14 0,27 0,3 0,3 0.51
ESR (mmh) 41 56 31 5 2 2 2 3 2
CRP (mg/dl) 13,33 13,03 12,3 4,37 0,04 0,07 0,23 0,7 0.07
MPO-ANCA (UI/ml) 666 200 0,9 0,5 0 0
Glucocorticoid (mg/kg/day) 0 0 0 0 1 gr IV 1 1 1 0.6 0.4 0.4 18.75 12.5
Methotrexate (mg/week) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 15 15
Note: WBC: white blood cells; sCreatinine: serum creatinine, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP: C reactive protein; MPO-ANCA: Myeloperoxidase ANCA
Table I: Laboratory parameters before hospital admission, during recovery and at the follow up of the induction phase

The search for antibodies directed against neutrophil cytoplasm (ANCA) revealed a high level of pANCA (pANCA ++, ELISA anti-MPO 666 UI/ml) associated with an increment of the indicators of inflammation. The renal ultrasound examination showed kidneys within the norm with a hyper-echogenicity of the parenchymal tissue. Within a few days from hospitalization, active urine sediment with associated microhematuria and proteinuria (1.5 gr/24h) was highlighted, with a progressive worsening of the renal function. The hypoesthesia of the right lower limb, which had worsened during the stay in our Nephrology Division, was investigated through electroneurography (ENG), with findings consistent with multiple mononeuropathy of the right lower limb, specifically involving the peroneal and tibial nerve, likely caused by vasculitis. Also, the cardiac function was reduced, as confirmed by a contractile dysfunction on echocardiogram with an ejection fraction (EF) of 50% and a diastolic disfunction of II grade. We investigated the cardiac damage with blood tests too; CPK was 18 UI/L and BNP 34 pg/ml (within the normal range). The differential diagnoses of the case are reported in Table II.

1) ASA Syndrome
2) COVID-19 disease
3) Hypereosinophilic syndrome
4) Systemic vasculitis
5) Parasitic infection
6) Aspergillosis
Table II: Differential diagnoses of the clinical case

Based on the criteria of the American Society of Rheumatology, subsequently revised in the Consensus of Chapel Hill in 1994, a diagnosis of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis was made. The four necessary criteria were all present: asthma, hyper-eosinophilia >10% at the complete blood count (CBC), transient/migrant pulmonary opacity, and inflammatory abnormalities of the paranasal sinuses. The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) was 44, thus demonstrating an active disease. The Five Factor Score [4], indicating short and long-term prognosis in vasculitis, was 1 out of 4 (doubled risk for mortality due to the pathology in 5 years). Furthermore, the positivity of high content ANCA was hinting at a long-term negative prognosis with risk of permanent organ-specific impairment and early mortality.

The induction therapy consisted in high-dosage intravenous glucorticoids; following the guidelines of the main nephrology and rheumatological scientific societies, it was decided to associate cyclophosphamide to glucocorticoids, in an attempt to improve the short and long-term prognosis. According to the Cyclops protocol, cyclophosphamide was administered intravenously and, subsequently, orally, with high dosages of glucocorticoids, according to regimen for pulsed CYC. The patient received 1 g/day intravenous methylprednisolone for 3 days, followed by oral prednisone (1 mg/kg/day oral, tapered to 0.4 mg/kg/day by month 3). Cyclophosphamide IV was adjusted for renal function and the first dose was 12.5 mg/kg IV in pulses; at week 2 the patient showed an increase of renal function (eGFR >50 ml/min/1.73 m2), so we decided to give the full dose of 15 mg/kg in IV pulses. At week 4, cyclophosphamide was also given at the full dose, without any adverse reaction. After three IV pulses, we agreed an oral therapy with the patient, at a dosage of 5 mg/kg orally for 3 days at weeks 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22 and 25, until remission. When the patient achieved remission, we opted for a maintenance therapy with Methotrexate (15 mg/week) and foline (10 mg/week). After 9 months of treatment, the patient reported a considerable improvement of the symptoms, which at that point did not necessitate any more pharmacological interventions. The eosinophils value was 0 cells/mm³ (Figure 3), the inflammation indexes were back to normal, and the renal function appeared significantly improved (Figure 4). Skin findings and the hypoesthesia of the right lower limb were completely regressed. An echocardiogram showed complete resolution of cardiac involvement, with normal contractile function and EF of 64%. During the induction phase, perfectly tolerated by the patient, the only thing to report is the appearance of a condition of hypogammaglobulinemia, in the absence of a significant increase in infectious events. The patient is currently continuing maintenance therapy with glucocorticoids and methotrexate, without any noteworthy problems.

Figure 3: Eosinophils trend before the start of induction therapy and during follow up. Induction therapy: methylprednisolone 1 g/day intravenous for 3 days and Cyclophosphamide 7.5 mg/kg in IV pulses
Figure 3: Eosinophils trend before the start of induction therapy and during follow up. Induction therapy: methylprednisolone 1 g/day intravenous for 3 days and Cyclophosphamide 7.5 mg/kg in IV pulses
Figure 4: sCreatinine trend before the start of induction therapy and during follow up. Induction therapy: methylprednisolone 1 g/day intravenous for 3 days and Cyclophosphamide 7.5 mg/kg in IV pulses
Figure 4: sCreatinine trend before the start of induction therapy and during follow up. Induction therapy: methylprednisolone 1 g/day intravenous for 3 days and Cyclophosphamide 7.5 mg/kg in IV pulses

 

Discussion

EGPA is a rare ANCA-associated vasculitis. In Europe the incidence rate is 0.5-6.8 new cases/year per million people [5]. The prevalence is higher at northern latitudes compared to southern Europe [6]. The disease occurs most commonly in 40–60-year-old people [5,8]. No sex predominance has been demonstrated [6].

The frequent detection of ANCA (mainly antibodies to myeloperoxidase), in 30-40% of cases, also suggests the disease is autoimmune. ANCA-positive patients are more commonly diagnosed with glomerulonephritis and mononeuritis, whereas ANCA-negative ones show more frequently endocardial, myocardial, and pulmonary eosinophilic infiltrates [5,8,9,10].

Interstitial lung disease has become the most diagnosed type of lung disease since 2020, due to the eruption of COVID-19 after the outbreak of SARS-CoV2 in Wuhan. Since then, there has been an important shift in epidemiology, aetiology, and outcome of pulmonary diseases. Moreover, our patient was affected by acute kidney damage, purpura, mononeuropathy, and cardiac involvement, all of which are also described in the COVID-19 disease. However, he was tested with two consecutive nasopharyngeal swab tests (PCR), both negative.

EGPA typically develops in three phases:

1) The allergic phase, characterized by the occurrence of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and sinusitis. In this case, the patient has a history of asthma;

2) The eosinophilic phase, in which the main pathological finding is the eosinophilic organ infiltrations (e.g., lungs, heart, and gastrointestinal system);

3) The vasculitic phase, characterized by purpura, peripheral neuropathy, and constitutional symptoms. Of interest, in this case, the kidney, pulmonary, cardiac, and nerve involvement. The vasculitic phase is typically preceded by constitutional symptoms (e.g., fever, weight loss, fatigue) [5]. Peripheral neuropathy is a key feature of this phase, affecting approximately 70% of the patients. The neuropathy is characterized by axonal damage in electrophysiological studies, and frequently affects the peroneal, tibial, ulnar, and median nerves; the most common pattern is mono neuritis multiplex, often complicated by asymmetric foot or wrist drop, which may progress to symmetric or asymmetric polyneuropathy.

Kidney involvement is present in approximately a third of the patients. The prevailing picture is ANCA-associated necrotizing crescentic glomerulonephritis [11].

The presence of 4 or more ACR classification criteria, including bronchial asthma, eosinophilia (more than 10%), paranasal sinus abnormalities, migratory or transient eosinophilic pulmonary infiltrates, extravascular eosinophil infiltration on biopsy, and mono- or polyneuropathy, has a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 100% [5,8,10]. We identified 5 of the 6 clinical criteria from the American College of Rheumatology. Furthermore, the diagnosis was strongly supported by the presence of ANCAs and anti-MPOs.

Differential diagnosis is important in reno-pulmonary syndromes. The most common pathologies are systemic rheumatic diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus. It is extremely important to exclude infections and malignancies since the immunosuppressive therapy could worsen these conditions. In this clinical case, the presence of hyper-eosinophilia and the absence of cavitations/nodules at chest CT scan, led us to a diagnosis of EGPA, instead of rheumatic diseases.

The treatment of EGPA depends on disease severity or risk stratification. Therapeutic agents used for the management of EGPA have a very real risk of adverse effects and must be used with care, even as the clinician recognizes the life-threatening nature of the vasculitis itself. For patients with milder diseases, oral glucocorticoids may be sufficient, whereas patients with the generalized active disease will usually require therapy with cytotoxic agents such as methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, or mycophenolate mofetil [12,13].

The main drugs for the treatment of EGPA are glucocorticoids, associated with cyclophosphamide or rituximab if FFS ≥1, as indicated by all the most recent guidelines [3,14,15,16,17,18]. In organ- or life-threatening manifestations, the recommended starting dose of prednisone is 1 mg/kg/day with a maximal daily dose of 80 mg for 2-3 weeks, with tapering to a minimal supporting dose selected individually to control the symptoms and minimize the adverse effects of treatment. Methylprednisolone (7.5-15 mg/kg/day) can be used as pulse therapy for life-threatening manifestations [14,15]. Many patients require steroid treatment for a long time or even for a lifetime as relapses of the disease frequently appear with decreased glucocorticoid dosage. Despite rapid tapering of glucocorticoids are recommended in some, more recent, nephrological and rheumatological guidelines [3,17], we decided to treat our patient with a high dosage of glucocorticoid for the notable hyper-eosinophilia and the presence of poor-prognosis factors. The higher dose is used for patients with more severe vasculitis. The American College of Rheumatology [16] does not specify the correct tapering dose, allowing clinicians to choose. We decided, despite the PEXIVAS recommendations, to maintain high doses of GCC during induction therapy.

Once the disease manifestations have come under control, the glucocorticoid dose is gradually tapered over approximately 12 to 18 months, as tolerated [13]. In the case of organ- or life-threatening manifestations, glucocorticoids in combination with cyclophosphamide are prescribed [14,15]. If EGPA is severe, treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants may be required to prevent organ damage. For ANCA-positive patients with renal involvement or refractory disease, immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide or rituximab can be considered [6, 14]. Insufficient data are available for EGPA to make a clear recommendation regarding this choice. Based on the EULAR/ERA-EDTA [15] recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis, cyclophosphamide was preferred (88% of strength of vote) by experts in the treatment of EGPA over rituximab (59% strength of vote). Nevertheless, rituximab is a safe and important alternative to standard therapy in EGPA, both for refractory and relapsing diseases, especially for ANCA-positive patients, and for newly diagnosed patients when traditional cytotoxic drugs are contraindicated or undesirable [19]. Due to the rare occurrence of EGPA, and the variety of its clinical manifestations, the diagnosis and treatment of this disease can be challenging.

As maintenance therapy, we decided to use Methotrexate instead of Azathioprine because of clinical reasons (the severe arthritis pattern of this case, particularly problematic for a manual laborer) and of the patient’s personal choices (to receive one Methotrexate injection administered as a single weekly dose of 15 mg IM). Maritati, et al. [20] have recently demonstrated that Methotrexate may be effective and safe for remission-maintenance in AAV and this approach was particularly appreciated by our patient.

 

Conclusions

A correct differential diagnosis is crucial in the choice of treatment. This case report presents peculiar manifestations of EGPA, treated with an induction therapy based on steroids and cyclophosphamide. After an almost 1-year-long observation we can report that the patient achieved complete remission and did not develop any complications during induction and maintenance therapy, except hypogammaglobulinemia after cyclophosphamide.

The early start of the therapy resulted in the sudden disappearance of the reported symptoms and the normalization of the altered blood chemistry parameters. The time between the onset of a severe disease and its diagnosis is crucial for treatment, which must be tailored and consider short- and long-term risk.

 

References

  1. Churg J, Strauss L. Allergic granulomatosis, allergic angiitis, and periarteritis nodosa. Am J Pathol 1951; 27:277-301. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1937314/
  2. Masi AT, Hunder GG, Lie JT, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Churg-Strauss syndrome (allergic granulomatosis and angiitis). Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33:1094-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780330806
  3. Rovin BH, Adler SG, Barratt J et al. KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases. Kidney Int 2021; 100(4S):S1-S276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021
  4. Guillevin L, Lhote F, Gayraud M, et al. Prognostic factors in polyarteritis nodosa and Churg-Strauss syndrome. A prospective study in 342 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 1996; 75:17-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005792-199601000-00003
  5. Gioffredi A, Maritati F, Oliva E, et al. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. An overview. Front Immunol 2014; 5:549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00549
  6. Beketova TV, Volkov MJ. The 2015 international guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Rheumatology Science and Practice 2016; 54(2):129-37. https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2016-129-137
  7. Gibelin A, Maldini C, Mahr A. Epidemiology and etiology of Wegener granulomatosis, microscopic polyangiitis, Churg-Strauss syndrome and goodpasture syndrome: Vasculitides with frequent lung involvement. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 32(3):264-73. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1279824
  8. Vaglio A, Buzio C, Zwerina J. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss): State of the art. Allergy 2013; 68(3):261-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12088
  9. Comarmond C, Pagnoux C, Khellaf M, et al. French vasculitis study group. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss): Clinical characteristics and long-term followup of the 383 patients enrolled in the French Vasculitis Study Group cohort. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65(1):270-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.37721
  10. Rolla G, Boita M, Heffler E, et al. Churg-Strauss syndrome: Clinical and pathogenetic approach to therapy. In Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Vasculitis. London, UK: InTech: 2011; 221-32. https://doi.org/10.5772/22813
  11. Sinico RA, Di Toma L: Clinicopathological features of Churg-Strauss syndrome-associated neuropathy. Am J Kidney Dis 2006 47:770-79. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.01.026 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16632015/
  12. Bosch X, Guilabert A, Espinosa G, Mirapeix E. Treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis: a systematic review. JAMA 2007; 298(6):655. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.6.655
  13. Ribi C, Cohen P, Pagnoux C, Mahr A, Arène JP, et al, French Vasculitis Study Group. Treatment of Churg-Strauss syndrome without poor-prognosis factors: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label study of seventy-two patients. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58(2):586. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23198
  14. Groh M, Pagnoux C, Baldini C, et al. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss) (EGPA) Consensus Task Force recommendations for evaluation and management. Eur J Intern Med 2015; 26(7):545-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2015.04.022
  15. Yates M, Watts RA, Bajema IM, et al. EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75:1583-94. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209133
  16. Chung A, Langford CA, Maz M, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody – Associated Vasculitis. Arthritis & Rheumatology 2021; 73(8):1366-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41773
  17. Mende A, Ennis D, Go E, et al. CanVasc Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody-associated Vasculitis: 2020 Update. J Rheumatol 2021; 48(4):555-66. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200721
  18. Chalisey A, Mahzuz K. Guidelines for the Management of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis with Renal Involvement. https://www.nnuh.nhs.uk/publication/guidelines-for-the-management-of-anca-associated-vasculitis-v1-2/
  19. Mohammad AJ, Hot A, Arndt F, Moosig F, Guerry M-J, et al. Rituximab for the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss). Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 75(2):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206095.
  20. Maritati F, Alberici F, Oliva E, Urban ML, Palmisano A, Santarsia F, et al. Methotrexate versus cyclophosphamide for remission maintenance in ANCA-associated vasculitis: A randomised trial. PLoS ONE 2017; 12(10):e0185880. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185880