Obesity and Kidney Disease: A Focus on Ciliopathies

Abstract

The prevalence of obesity is progressively increasing on a global scale. Among its negative health consequences, renal damage is also observed. It is due to hemodynamic, metabolic, and inflammatory alterations.
Ciliopathies are a group of disorders caused by dysfunction of the primary cilium; these include autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) as well as Alström and Bardet-Biedl syndromes. In ADPKD, obesity accelerates kidney disease progression. In Alström and Bardet-Biedl syndromes, renal disease is likely due to both local and systemic factors; in these syndromes, obesity represents one of the most common clinical manifestations, and studies are currently underway to evaluate its role in the progression of chronic kidney disease.
The management of obesity involves lifestyle interventions, medications, and surgery. Interesting new pharmacological advances are now available for both obesity in the general population and obesity associated with certain genetic disorders; the protective role of many of these drugs in the progression of chronic kidney disease – sometimes even independent of weight loss – is an observation that further highlights the intricate relationship between dysmetabolism and kidney disease.

Keywords: obesity, chronic kidney disease, ciliopathies, ADPKD, Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Alström syndrome

Obesity and Renal Health. Epidemiology

Adult obesity is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m², while overweight is defined as a BMI between 25 and 29.99 kg/m². In Europe, the prevalence of obesity is around 20%, with some countries exceeding 30%, and it is projected to reach 24% globally by 2035 [1, 2].
Obesity is more common among individuals with a genetic predisposition, which may be monogenic, oligogenic, or polygenic. Non-syndromic monogenic forms are rare and are typically associated with mutations in genes that regulate the interaction between the brain and adipose tissue, such as those encoding leptin, its receptor, the melanocortin 4 receptor, proconvertase 1, and proopiomelanocortin, which are involved in the leptin-melanocortin pathway. Oligogenic forms account for approximately 3% of cases, while most hereditary obesity has a polygenic basis influenced by epigenetic factors [3].
The detrimental effect of obesity on kidney function is well documented. A systematic review and meta-analysis confirmed that obesity is an independent risk factor for the development of albuminuria (relative risk 1.51, 95% CI 1.36-1.67) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73m² (relative risk 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.54) [4]. Furthermore, obesity is a risk factor for nephrolithiasis [5].
Epidemiological and observational studies report that 4-10% of obese patients exhibit proteinuria. However, determining the true incidence of obesity-related glomerulopathy is challenging due to variations in the biopsy protocols adopted by different centers [3].
Indices that measure central fat distribution, such as the waist-to-hip ratio, are more closely associated with the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) than BMI [6, 7]. Although BMI is the most commonly used parameter in clinical practice, it has several limitations, including its inability to differentiate body composition (which is important in the context of potential fluid retention) and fat distribution. An elevated waist-to-hip ratio (≥0.9 in men and ≥0.8 in women) is associated with a higher risk of reduced renal filtration, independent of BMI. This is because central adiposity correlates with diminished renal function even in non-obese individuals. Moreover, advanced techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) can provide more accurate measurements of metabolically active visceral fat [1, 810]. The distribution of adipose tissue appears to partly explain the difference in CKD risk between men and women [11].
Another promising index is the weight-adjusted waist index (WWI), calculated as waist circumference in centimeters divided by the square root of body weight in kilograms. The WWI was found to be the best indicator of obesity for predicting CKD and albuminuria compared to other parameters such as BMI, the waist-to-height ratio (WHTR), or waist circumference (WC) [12, 13].
A prospective study of 2,711 Korean participants with normal renal function and an average follow-up of 11 years reported a CKD incidence of 7%. The risk of renal disease was higher in patients with elevated BMI values and, more significantly, with higher waist-to-hip ratios. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that reducing obesity improves renal prognosis [14].
A study by Kanda et al. examined the effects of weight loss on renal function in healthy individuals, revealing significant differences based on sex, the rate of weight loss, and baseline BMI [15].
A multivariate analysis of data from the CureGN study did not find an increased risk of renal events in obese patients with glomerulopathies. However, the study had several limitations [16].

 

Renal damage

Renal damage associated with obesity results from both direct effects of adipose tissue on the kidneys and systemic complications related to conditions such as diabetes, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, and hypertension. These factors lead to hemodynamic, metabolic, and inflammatory alterations that underlie renal injury [3] (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Obesity causes hemodynamic, inflammatory, and metabolic alterations that damage the kidney. In addition, intrinsic factors, such as genetic mutations, may compound this damage.
  • Glomerular hyperfiltration and hemodynamic alterations [3, 4, 11, 17] In the presence of insulin resistance, sympathetic nervous system overactivity, and activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), glomerular hypertension and an increased glomerular filtration rate occur.
    The dilation of the afferent arteriole coupled with efferent arteriole vasoconstriction – although initially compensatory – over time leads to glomerular hypertrophy, glomerulosclerosis, and proteinuria (generally subnephrotic, rarely nephrotic). Additionally, visceral fat may exert mechanical compression on the kidneys and vessels, further contributing to RAS activation, while adipose tissue directly produces RAS components (such as aldosterone and angiotensinogen), inducing sodium retention and volume expansion.
  • Adipose Tissue [3, 11, 18] Perirenal fat and renal sinus fat (RSF), located near the renal arteries, compress the renal structures and secrete cytokines and angiogenic factors that influence the vascular wall. Studies have shown that an increase in RSF mass may worsen microalbuminuria, particularly during physical exercise, although available data remains limited.
    Moreover, adipose tissue releases proinflammatory cytokines that promote a state of chronic inflammation and oxidative stress while reducing the production of adiponectin, which has anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing properties. Hyperleptinemia, observed in patients with CKD, exacerbates inflammation, stimulates sympathetic tone, sodium reabsorption, glomerular cell proliferation, and increases type IV collagen synthesis, promoting fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis. Mesangial cells respond to leptin by increasing glucose uptake, undergoing hypertrophy, and, as well as endothelial cells, enhancing the release of extracellular matrix components.
  • Insulin Resistance and Hyperinsulinemia[1, 6, 11] These factors contribute to renal damage through mechanisms such as glomerular hyperfiltration, albuminuria, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction. It is important to note that the predisposition to insulin resistance is not determined solely by BMI; even individuals with normal weight can be at risk for developing complications.

Therefore, adipose tissue is not merely an energy storage depot but an endocrine organ that secretes adipokines, regulating processes such as inflammation, metabolism, appetite, cardiovascular function, and immunity. In fact, the type and amount of adipokines released by adipose tissue depend on several factors, including the type of adipocytes (white or brown), their quantity, location, and interactions with other cells.
Adipocytes are primarily divided into two categories: white adipocytes, which are most abundant in adults and store energy in the form of triglycerides, and brown adipocytes, which are less numerous and more abundant in neonates, storing energy in small lipid droplets. In addition, there is a third type, beige adipocytes – a subtype of white adipocytes – that, in response to cold exposure or specific pharmacological agents, acquire characteristics similar to brown adipocytes. The activation of the beiging process increases energy expenditure and improves carbohydrate and lipid metabolism [19].

Clinically, the earliest sign of obesity-related renal damage is a gradual increase in subnephrotic-range proteinuria [18].
Weight reduction lowers levels of obesity-related proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, MCP-1, and serum amyloid) [11].

 

Histopathological Alterations

The kidneys of obese patients tend to increase in volume [1, 6]. The diagnosis of obesity-related glomerulopathy (ORG) is based on the clinical and histopathological exclusion of other renal diseases in subjects with a BMI ≥30 kg/m². Histopathologically, ORG is characterized by glomerulomegaly, which may be accompanied by secondary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, often localized in the perihilar glomeruli. Additionally, one may observe a reduction in podocyte density, an increase in the width of foot processes, thickening of the glomerular basement membrane, expansion of the mesangial matrix, and mesangial sclerosis.

Histological studies have also demonstrated that renal tubules can be affected, showing hypertrophy of the proximal tubular epithelial cells. Intracellular lipid vacuoles may occasionally be observed in these epithelial cells, as well as in podocytes and mesangial cells [3, 18].

An important factor in the development of ORG is the presence of predisposing conditions, such as a low nephron number at birth and renal anomalies that, when coupled with compensatory growth, may further promote glomerular hyperfiltration. Frequently associated with visceral obesity, hypertriglyceridemia is another factor that worsens renal outcomes.

 

Treatment of Obesity

The management of obesity includes lifestyle modifications (physical activity, nutrition, behavioral therapy), medications, and bariatric surgery.

Physical activity can reduce mortality risk even in patients with CKD, although there are currently no definitive recommendations regarding frequency, intensity, and duration; therefore, a gradual increase in activity is advised. In polycystic patients, activities that might cause trauma sufficient to rupture cysts should be avoided.

Various dietary interventions have been proposed for patients with ADPKD (e.g., caloric restriction, intermittent fasting, time-restricted feeding, and the ketogenic diet): in these patients, in addition to the benefits related to reduced visceral adiposity, an improvement in nutrient control and cellular energy status is hypothesized, which may influence the mTOR pathway that is abnormally activated in renal cysts [11, 20].

The first-line pharmacological choice for obesity-related hypertension are ACE inhibitors or ARBs because they reduce the risk of obesity-associated glomerulopathy and are associated with a lower incidence of diabetes and favorable effects on left ventricular hypertrophy [17]. Sodium restriction is also important.

When lifestyle interventions are insufficient, a broad range of medications may be used for the treatment of obesity (indicated for a BMI ≥30 kg/m² or ≥27 kg/m² in the presence of weight-related comorbidities). Approved drugs for body weight management include orlistat, extended-release naltrexone/bupropion, controlled-release phentermine/topiramate (a combination of a sympathomimetic and a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, not approved by the EMA), setmelanotide, GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide and semaglutide), and dual GLP-1/GIP agonists (tirzepatide).

Orlistat is an intestinal lipase inhibitor that reduces fatty acid absorption by up to 30%, leading to approximately 5% weight loss. The most common side effects include flatulence and malabsorption, which can result in reduced levels of vitamin D, vitamin E, and beta-carotene, making supplementation necessary.

The bupropion-naltrexone combination reduces appetite and cravings. Bupropion is a norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitor that promotes activation of the melanocortin pathway. Naltrexone, a μ-opioid receptor antagonist, mitigates the auto-inhibitory feedback triggered by bupropion on hypothalamic anorexigenic neurons. Common side effects include nausea, vomiting, headache, insomnia, and dry mouth; the potential emergence of suicidal thoughts should be monitored.

Liraglutide is a GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide) receptor agonist that reduces appetite, slows gastric emptying, and helps balance insulin and glucagon secretion. At a dose of 3 mg/day, liraglutide can reduce body weight by 5-10% and delay the onset of diabetes in obese prediabetic individuals, while also improving glycemic control, blood pressure, and lipid profile. A dose of 1.8 mg is associated with a decreased risk of major cardiovascular events in diabetic patients. Its adverse effects are primarily gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea), which can be mitigated by gradual dose escalation. It is contraindicated in patients with a history of pancreatitis, in pregnant women, and in individuals with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN).

Semaglutide, a long-acting GLP-1 agonist, is used either to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in adults with cardiovascular disease associated with obesity/overweight or for weight loss in obese or overweight patients with related comorbidities. It works by slowing gastric emptying and producing a central anorexigenic effect. Its main adverse effects are gastrointestinal, and similarly to liraglutide, it is contraindicated in pregnancy and in patients at risk for medullary thyroid carcinoma or MEN.

Tirzepatide is a GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonist that, when administered once weekly, reduces appetite, increases insulin sensitivity, and enhances glucose and triglyceride uptake in adipose tissue. The SURMOUNT studies have reported an average weight loss of 20%, with predominantly gastrointestinal side effects and low treatment discontinuation rates.

Setmelanotide is a melanocortin-4 receptor agonist that reduces appetite. Approved for the treatment of certain forms of monogenic obesity and for patients with Bardet-Biedl syndrome, it is administered subcutaneously once daily. The main adverse effects are local injection site reactions, hyperpigmentation, and nausea; there is a manufacturer warning regarding suicidal ideation and depression.

Some drugs, although not specific for obesity management, have beneficial effects on body weight, such as metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitors.

Metformin reduces hepatic glucose production and increases insulin sensitivity. The hypothesized mechanisms for weight reduction include activation of AMPK, an increase in levels of anorexigenic hormones, and enhanced leptin sensitivity. Clinical studies indicate a long-term weight reduction of around 3%, with mainly gastrointestinal side effects and a rare risk of lactic acidosis; prolonged use may cause vitamin B12 deficiency.

SGLT-2 is the protein responsible for reabsorbing most of the glucose in the renal tubules. In patients with diabetes mellitus, SGLT-2 overexpression is often observed during the hyperfiltration phase, exacerbating hyperglycemia and renal stress. This has led to the development of SGLT-2 inhibitors, a class of drugs that block these cotransporters, increasing urinary glucose excretion. SGLT-2 inhibitors improve glycemic control, reduce blood pressure, mortality, and cardiovascular morbidity, slow CKD progression (by reducing hyperfiltration, proteinuria, oxidative stress, and inflammation), and result in an approximate weight loss of 2 kg, although this effect may also be partly due to reduced body water and offset by an increased appetite. The main adverse effects include urinary and genital infections, dehydration, and, in rare cases, diabetic ketoacidosis due to increased lipolysis and free fatty acid release [3, 11, 17, 21, 22].

Several of the aforementioned drugs are known to exert a protective effect against the progression of renal disease, particularly SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, and tirzepatide (Table 1).

Class Main Effects
GLP-1 agonists Reduction of proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress, improved glycemic and blood pressure control, decreased proteinuria and hyperfiltration (natriuresis) in DKD, weight loss, and RAAS inhibition (likely via an indirect mechanism).
Tirzepatide Similar effects to GLP-1 agonists, with a more pronounced impact on body weight and metabolism due to its action on GIP.
SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) Reduction of hyperfiltration, increased natriuresis, decreased proteinuria, and cardiovascular and renal protection independent of glycemic control.
Table 1. Main effects of selected drugs with protective action on renal function.

Regarding bariatric/metabolic surgery, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend bariatric surgery as a treatment option for individuals with a BMI ≥40 kg/m², or between 35 and 40 kg/m² in the presence of comorbidities (e.g., type 2 diabetes, hypertension) that may benefit from weight loss. Recently, new guidelines from ASMBS and IFSO have significantly expanded the indications for surgery, recommending consideration of surgery for individuals with a BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m² in the presence of metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes when non-surgical therapies have yielded insufficient results. In some cases, for patients of different ethnic backgrounds (e.g., Asians with a BMI >27.5 kg/m²) or as a “bridge” to subsequent treatments (such as organ transplantation), bariatric surgery may be indicated [23].

The two most common procedures are laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). A systematic review found that, one year after the intervention, the LRYGB technique achieved a slightly higher percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) compared to LSG; however, at 5 years the differences between the two techniques were not significant, with mean values of 28.1% for LRYGB and 27.0% for LSG [24].

Weight loss reduces proteinuria and microalbuminuria in CKD patients. The proposed mechanisms include improved blood pressure control, lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, reduced leptin levels, lower activation of the RAAS, decreased glomerular hyperfiltration, and reduced inflammatory processes.

Further larger and longer-term studies will be useful to better understand the effect of weight loss on CKD progression [11].

 

Obesity and Ciliopathies

Cilia are microtubular structures classified, based on the architecture of their axoneme, into motile (9+2) and non-motile (9+0) types. The latter, known as primary cilia, are widely expressed throughout the body and function as sensors and transducers of cellular signals. Through receptors such as Wnt, Hedgehog, TGFβ, and PDGFR, primary cilia participate in the transduction of extracellular signals [25].
The term “ciliopathies” refers to a group of disorders caused by dysfunction of the primary cilium, such as autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS), Alström syndrome (ALMS), and Senior-Løken syndrome.

ADPKD

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) affects over 10 million people worldwide and is primarily caused by variants in the PKD1 and PKD2 genes, which encode polycystin 1 (PC1) and polycystin 2 (PC2), respectively. These proteins maintain primary cilium function and preserve the integrity of the renal tubules.
It is noteworthy that there is evidence for a dual ciliary function: in normal renal cells, the primary cilium inhibits cyst formation, whereas in ADPKD – when the polycystin complex is altered – it promotes cystic growth [2629].

The accumulation of adipose tissue can exacerbate the metabolic defects associated with ADPKD by influencing various cellular signaling pathways.
In the HALT-PKD A study, a high BMI was associated with a greater increase in total kidney volume (TKV) and a more rapid decline in eGFR. In obese patients, the risk of rapid TKV progression (annual variation rate ≥7% versus <5%) was approximately four times higher, and the annual percentage increase in TKV was more than 50% greater compared to normal-weight patients.
In the TEMPO 3-4 study, the association between BMI and TKV increase was confirmed, whereas the decline in eGFR correlated with BMI only in women. To avoid bias due to the weight contribution of the cysts, in both cited studies TKV was calculated by subtracting the estimated cyst weight. Discrepancies in the results may be attributable to the lack of consideration of body fat distribution or other factors.

The TEMPO 3:4 study demonstrated that the efficacy of Tolvaptan, a drug used to slow the progression of ADPKD, was independent of BMI. However, a subsequent retrospective cohort study revealed that an increase in visceral fat more accurately predicts renal volume expansion than BMI in lean subjects, and that the drug’s efficacy decreases with increasing visceral fat [11, 3032].

Obesity affects hormone and cytokine levels, leading to increased activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway, which promotes cell survival and growth. Adiponectin – whose levels are reduced in obesity – activates AMPK, which in turn inhibits the mTOR pathway and reduces cellular proliferation. Concurrently, cytokines released from visceral fat, such as IL-6 and TNF-α, stimulate inflammation and cell proliferation, while insulin activates the PI3K-Akt, mTOR, and MAPK pathways. Moreover, saturated fatty acids bind to fetuin, an endogenous ligand for TLR2/TLR4 receptors, triggering a chronic low-grade inflammatory response.

Weight loss in obese subjects with ADPKD represents a potential therapeutic target to improve metabolic status, reduce TKV increase, and the pro-inflammatory response [11].

Syndromic ciliopathies characterized by obesity and kidney disease: Bardet-Biedl syndrome and Alström syndrome

Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) and Alström syndrome (ALMS) present a clinical spectrum that includes early-onset obesity and renal dysfunction.

Bardet-Biedl syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 120,000 to 160,000 in North America and Europe, while in some isolated communities, the frequency is significantly higher. Diagnosis, based on Beales’s criteria, requires the presence of at least four primary features or three primary and two secondary features. Early diagnosis can be challenging, as clinical signs manifest progressively over time, and genetic testing can be useful for confirmation [33].

Obesity is one of the primary clinical features of BBS and manifests early: although birth weight is normal, 90% of patients experience weight gain within the first year of life, with obesity becoming evident by age three. A study by Feuillan et al. showed that BBS patients have greater visceral adiposity than BMI-matched controls, even after adjusting for covariates (age, sex, race, and total body fat percentage measured via DEXA). However, after further adjusting for age, sex, race, total body fat percentage, free testosterone, and estradiol, the difference in visceral fat adiposity becomes non-significant (p = 0.06). Leptin levels are higher than in controls relative to the degree of adiposity, suggesting resistance to this hormone.
In a comparison between groups with BBS10 and BBS1 mutations, the former showed higher BMI Z-scores and greater visceral obesity than the latter. Other genotype-phenotype studies suggest that BBS1 mutations are linked to a milder obesity phenotype compared to other BBS genotypes (a difference that seems to diminish in adolescence), while BBS9 and BBS4 mutations are associated with higher BMI. Children with loss-of-function mutations have a higher risk of developing severe obesity [3335].

The prevalence of kidney disease in BBS patients varies across studies, partly due to differing definitions. A study by Forsythe et al. on 350 patients found that 31% of children and 42% of adults had CKD at stages 2-5, while CKD stages 4-5 were present in 6% of pediatric subjects and 8% of adults. Meyer et al., analyzing 607 BBS patients from the Clinical Registry Investigation of BBS (CRIBBS), identified an end-stage renal disease (more accurately termed ‘Kidney Failure’) stage in 44 individuals (7.2%).

Renal abnormalities arise from both anatomical and functional causes, and the pathogenesis of kidney disease remains partially understood. The expression of BBS proteins in the kidney suggests a local contribution to renal damage. A study on 54 patients found that hyposthenuria was associated with a more rapid decline in eGFR. This reduced urine concentration capacity may indicate a tubulointerstitial disorder. Furthermore, the observation that even patients with preserved eGFR exhibit abnormalities on functional magnetic resonance imaging, particularly in the medullary region, strengthens the hypothesis of a primary tubulointerstitial disorder.

The frequent presence of factors such as obesity, diabetes, and hypertension highlights the need for in-depth analyses to quantify their contribution to kidney damage. Our recent observational study of 65 patients with BBS demonstrated that reduced eGFR correlates with hypertension and truncating mutations in any BBS gene; moreover, in multivariate analysis, BMI was independently associated with eGFR decline (β = –2.45; p < 0.0001). The presence of significant phenotypic discordance in 50% of patients with the same pathogenic variants supports the hypothesis of an interplay between intrinsic and secondary factors [33, 36, 37].

The etiopathogenic mechanisms underlying obesity in certain ciliopathies are not yet fully understood and appear to derive from multiple factors involving energy metabolism regulation at both central and peripheral levels. Neurons and glial cells also possess cilia, and the hypothalamus plays an essential role in energy homeostasis. In the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus, two neuronal populations – AgRP and POMC neurons – regulate appetite and energy expenditure: AgRP neurons activate under energy deficit conditions and are inhibited by insulin and leptin, whereas POMC neurons activate under energy surplus conditions, reducing food intake and increasing energy expenditure [2, 38].

Studies on obesity in BBS have primarily focused on the role of BBS proteins in intracellular trafficking to the primary cilium or plasma membrane. The primary cilium is crucial for leptin signal transduction in the hypothalamus, and its alteration has also been observed in BBS patients, who exhibit higher plasma leptin levels than controls. Additionally, anomalies in the trafficking of neuropeptide Y and serotonin (5-HT2C) receptors have been proposed as potential contributors to obesity development.
Another aspect concerns adipogenesis dysfunction: during differentiation, preadipocytes express a primary cilium that hosts receptors for Wnt and Hedgehog signaling pathways, essential for proper adipocyte development. Finally, BBS1 and BBS2 proteins are indispensable for the correct trafficking of the insulin receptor to the plasma membrane [33, 39].

Regarding Alström syndrome, studies on murine models with Alms1 gene mutations show a reduction in the percentage of ciliated hypothalamic neurons, associated with a significant decrease in energy expenditure. The molecular details of this mechanism remain unclear [2].

Alström syndrome is an autosomal recessive condition characterized by a broad range of clinical manifestations, including obesity, insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertriglyceridemia, hearing loss, cardiomyopathy, retinal dystrophy, progressive kidney, and liver disease. Its estimated prevalence ranges from 1 to 10 cases per million people. Obesity and insulin resistance typically begin to develop during the first year of life. A study by Waldman et al. on 38 patients with Alström syndrome found that among 25 observed children, only 20% had a normal weight, while 8% were overweight and 72% were obese. In the adult population (13 patients), 15% were overweight, and 85% were obese, with insulin resistance present in 100% of cases.
While BBS can be caused by mutations in over 20 genes, Alström syndrome is caused by mutations in the ALMS1 gene [33, 40, 41]. Patients with ALMS, but not all individuals with BBS, are predisposed to type 2 diabetes, suggesting a complexity in the regulation of ciliary function, with some alterations potentially even providing protection against metabolic disorders (interestingly, the absence of BBS12 in mice increases adipogenesis but, paradoxically, also enhances insulin sensitivity) [42, 43].

Renal function tends to deteriorate with age, as evidenced by Waldman’s study and previous studies by Marshall et al.
In Waldman et al.’s study, about 20% of patients aged 20 to 38 years met the criteria for chronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosis, with renal impairment likely linked to the absence of the ALMS1 protein, although the contribution of associated conditions such as metabolic dysfunction cannot be excluded [41].

The therapeutic approach for obesity in ciliopathies is based on lifestyle modifications, which include a hypocaloric diet and aerobic physical activity tailored to the patient’s clinical condition. In addition, improving sleep hygiene and increasing sleep duration may contribute to obesity management. An optimal strategy involves the support of a multidisciplinary team composed of physicians, dietitians, psychologists and physical therapists. In high-risk obese patients, bariatric surgery may be considered, although its long-term effects remain under investigation. A review has highlighted less durable benefits in subjects with hyperphagic disorders [2, 33].

In diabetic patients, treatments that improve insulin sensitivity without causing weight gain should be prioritized (e.g., metformin, incretins, SGLT2 inhibitors) [36].

Obesity is one of the clinical features of Bardet-Biedl and Alström syndrome, for which there are promising therapeutic developments. Setmelanotide, an agonist of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R), was approved in the United States in 2020 and in Europe in 2021 for the treatment of obesity caused by mutations in POMC, PCSK1, and LEPR in individuals over 6 years of age [33]. In 2022, the FDA extended the therapeutic indication of setmelanotide to patients with Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS), based on a phase 3 study that demonstrated, after 52 weeks of treatment, that approximately 30% of participants (aged over 12 years) achieved a ≥10% reduction in body weight, with an average BMI reduction of over 9% within one year [44, 45].

A recent study investigated the efficacy of setmelanotide in children under 6 years of age and, in the BBS group, observed an average percentage reduction in BMI of 10% at week 52 [44, 46]. An abstract reporting the extension of the phase 3 study indicated sustained clinical benefits after 3 years of continuous treatment with the drug, with average weight losses of approximately 20 kg in adults and a 19.4% reduction in BMI percentiles in pediatric patients [47].

Ganawa et al. reported a case of GLP-1 agonist use in a young woman with BBS, who had childhood-onset obesity and hyperphagia. Due to weight regain upon dose reduction, it was necessary to maintain the medication. Similarly, in Alström syndrome data suggest that GLP-1 receptor agonists are not inferior in these forms of obesity compared to polygenic forms [48].

Several beneficial metabolic effects of these drugs have been observed independently of BMI reduction [48, 49].

Currently, there are no specific interventions to prevent kidney damage. Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage uremia. An increase in the median BMI has been reported in the cohort of transplant patients compared to non-transplanted individuals, so it is advisable to employ immunosuppressive regimens that allow for reduced steroid use and, in particular, to carefully evaluate the use of tacrolimus, considering the higher risk of post-transplant diabetes (NODAT) in obese patients [33, 36, 50].

 

Bibliography

  1. Hojs R, Ekart R, Bevc S, Vodošek Hojs N (2023) Chronic Kidney Disease and Obesity. Nephron 147:660–664. https://doi.org/10.1159/000531379.
  2. Zhang Q, Huang Y, Gao S, et al (2024) Obesity-Related Ciliopathies: Focus on Advances of Biomarkers. Int J Mol Sci 25:8484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158484
  3. Nawaz S, Chinnadurai R, Al‐Chalabi S, et al (2023) Obesity and chronic kidney disease: A current review. Obes Sci Pract 9:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.629.
  4. Garofalo C, Borrelli S, Minutolo R, et al (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis suggests obesity predicts onset of chronic kidney disease in the general population. Kidney Int 91:1224–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2016.12.013.
  5. Carbone A, Al Salhi Y, Tasca A, et al (2018) Obesity and kidney stone disease: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nefrol 70. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03113-2.
  6. Kotsis V, Martinez F, Trakatelli C, Redon J (2021) Impact of Obesity in Kidney Diseases. Nutrients 13:4482. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124482.
  7. Yun H-R, Kim H, Park JT, et al (2018) Obesity, Metabolic Abnormality, and Progression of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 72:400–410. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.02.362.
  8. Pinto-Sietsma S-J, Navis G, Janssen WMT, et al (2003) A central body fat distribution is related to renal function impairment, even in lean subjects. Am J Kidney Dis 41:733–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6386(03)00020-9.
  9. Shuster A, Patlas M, Pinthus JH, Mourtzakis M (2012) The clinical importance of visceral adiposity: a critical review of methods for visceral adipose tissue analysis. Br J Radiol 85:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/38447238.
  10. Lee MJ, Park JT, Park KS, et al (2016) Normal body mass index with central obesity has increased risk of coronary artery calcification in Korean patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 90:1368–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2016.09.011.
  11. Steele C, Nowak K (2022) Obesity, Weight Loss, Lifestyle Interventions, and Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Kidney Dial 2:106–122. https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial2010013.
  12. Park Y, Kim NH, Kwon TY, Kim SG (2018). A novel adiposity index as an integrated predictor of cardiometabolic disease morbidity and mortality. Sci Rep 8:16753. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35073-4.
  13. Li X, Wang L, Zhou H, Xu H (2023) Association between weight-adjusted-waist index and chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol 24:266. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03316-w.
  14. Song SH, Oh TR, Suh SH, et al (2024) Obesity is associated with incident chronic kidney disease in individuals with normal renal function. Korean J Intern Med 39:813–822. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2023.491.
  15. Kanda E, Muneyuki T, Suwa K, Nakajima K (2015) Effects of Weight Loss Speed on Kidney Function Differ Depending on Body Mass Index in Nondiabetic Healthy People: A Prospective Cohort. PLOS ONE 10:e0143434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143434.
  16. Zeitler EM, Glenn DA, Hu Y, et al (2024) Association of Obesity With Kidney and Cardiac Outcomes Among Patients With Glomerular Disease: Findings From the Cure Glomerulonephropathy Network. Am J Kidney Dis 84:306-319.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.03.020.
  17. García-Carro C, Vergara A, Bermejo S, et al (2021) A Nephrologist Perspective on Obesity: From Kidney Injury to Clinical Management. Front Med 8:655871. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.655871.
  18. Avgoustou E, Tzivaki I, Diamantopoulou G, et al (2025) Obesity-Related Chronic Kidney Disease: From Diagnosis to Treatment. Diagn Basel Switz 15:169. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020169.
  19. Clemente-Suárez VJ, Redondo-Flórez L, Beltrán-Velasco AI, et al (2023) The Role of Adipokines in Health and Disease. Biomedicines 11:1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051290.
  20. Kipp KR, Rezaei M, Lin L, et al (2016) A mild reduction of food intake slows disease progression in an orthologous mouse model of polycystic kidney disease. Am J Physiol-Ren Physiol 310:F726–F731. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00551.2015.
  21. Tchang BG, Aras M, Kumar RB, Aronne LJ (2000) Pharmacologic Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al (eds) Endotext. MDText.com, Inc., South Dartmouth (MA).
  22. Tsalouchos A (2023) Inibitori del cotrasportatore sodio-glucosio di tipo 2 in pazienti sottoposti a trapianto renale. G Clin Nefrol E Dialisi 35:73–81. https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2023.2620.
  23. Courcoulas AP, Daigle CR, Arterburn DE (2023) Long term outcomes of metabolic/bariatric surgery in adults. BMJ e071027. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071027.
  24. Van Rijswijk A-S, Van Olst N, Schats W, et al (2021) What Is Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery Expressed in Percentage Total Weight Loss (%TWL)? A Systematic Review. Obes Surg 31:3833–3847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05394-x.
  25. McConnachie DJ, Stow JL, Mallett AJ (2021) Ciliopathies and the Kidney: A Review. Am J Kidney Dis 77:410–419. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.08.012.
  26. Ma M (2021) Cilia and polycystic kidney disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol 110:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.05.003.
  27. H. Kathem S, M. Mohieldin A, M. Nauli S, 1 College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio; (2013) The Roles of Primary cilia in Polycystic Kidney Disease. AIMS Mol Sci 1:27–46. https://doi.org/10.3934/molsci.2013.1.27.
  28. Boletta A (2009) Emerging evidence of a link between the polycystins and the mTOR pathways. PathoGenetics 2:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8417-2-6.
  29. Reiterová J, Tesař V (2022) Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: From Pathophysiology of Cystogenesis to Advances in the Treatment. Int J Mol Sci 23:3317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063317.
  30. Nowak KL, Moretti F, Bussola N, et al (2024) Visceral Adiposity and Progression of ADPKD: A Cohort Study of Patients From the TEMPO 3:4 Trial. Am J Kidney Dis 84:275-285.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.02.014.
  31. Nowak KL, Steele C, Gitomer B, et al (2021) Overweight and Obesity and Progression of ADPKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 16:908–915. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.16871020.
  32. Torres VE, Chapman AB, Perrone RD, et al (2012) Analysis of baseline parameters in the HALT polycystic kidney disease trials. Kidney Int 81:577–585. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.411.
  33. Melluso A, Secondulfo F, Capolongo G, et al (2023) Bardet-Biedl Syndrome: Current Perspectives and Clinical Outlook. Ther Clin Risk Manag Volume 19:115–132. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S338653.
  34. Feuillan PP, Ng D, Han JC, et al (2011) Patients with Bardet-Biedl syndrome have hyperleptinemia suggestive of leptin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:E528-535. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2290.
  35. Pomeroy J, Krentz AD, Richardson JG, et al (2021) Bardet-Biedl syndrome: Weight patterns and genetics in a rare obesity syndrome. Pediatr Obes 16:e12703. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12703.
  36. Dollfus H, Lilien MR, Maffei P, et al (2024) Bardet-Biedl syndrome improved diagnosis criteria and management: Inter European Reference Networks consensus statement and recommendations. Eur J Hum Genet 32:1347–1360. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-024-01634-7.
  37. Zacchia M, Secondulfo F, Melluso A, et al (2024) CKD in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome: Evidence Supporting Multifactorial Etiology. Kidney Int Rep S2468024924019983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2024.10.030.
  38. Brüning JC, Fenselau H (2023) Integrative neurocircuits that control metabolism and food intake. Science 381:eabl7398. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl7398.
  39. Zhong B, Nie N, Dong M (2024) Molecular mechanisms of the obesity associated with Bardet‐Biedl syndrome: An update. Obes Rev e13859. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13859.
  40. Vaisse C, Reiter JF, Berbari NF (2017) Cilia and Obesity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 9:a028217. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a028217.
  41. Waldman M, Han JC, Reyes-Capo DP, et al (2018) Alström syndrome: Renal findings in correlation with obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and cardiomyopathy in 38 patients prospectively evaluated at the NIH clinical center. Mol Genet Metab 125:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.07.010.
  42. Zhang Y, Hao J, Tarrago MG, et al (2021) FBF1 deficiency promotes beiging and healthy expansion of white adipose tissue. Cell Rep 36:109481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109481.
  43. Marion V, Mockel A, De Melo C, et al (2012) BBS-Induced Ciliary Defect Enhances Adipogenesis, Causing Paradoxical Higher-Insulin Sensitivity, Glucose Usage, and Decreased Inflammatory Response. Cell Metab 16:363–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.08.005.
  44. Haqq AM, Chung WK, Dollfus H, et al (2022) Efficacy and safety of setmelanotide, a melanocortin-4 receptor agonist, in patients with Bardet-Biedl syndrome and Alström syndrome: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial with an open-label period. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 10:859–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00277-7.
  45. Forsythe E, Haws RM, Argente J, et al (2023) Quality of life improvements following one year of setmelanotide in children and adult patients with Bardet–Biedl syndrome: phase 3 trial results. Orphanet J Rare Dis 18:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02602-4.
  46. Argente J, Verge CF, Okorie U, et al (2024) Setmelanotide in patients aged 2–5 years with rare MC4R pathway-associated obesity (VENTURE): a 1 year, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol S2213858724002730. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00273-0.
  47. Yanovski J, Angel M-MG, Malhotra S, et al (2024) 3-year setmelanotide weight outcomes in patients with bardet-biedl syndrome and obesity. Endocr Abstr. https://doi.org/10.1530/endoabs.99.EP23.
  48. Ali S, Baig S, Wanninayake S, et al (2024) G lucagon‐like peptide‐1 analogues in monogenic syndromic obesity: Real‐world data from a large cohort of Alström syndrome patients. Diabetes Obes Metab 26:989–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15398.
  49. Haqq AM, Poitou C, Chung WK, et al (2025) Impact of Setmelanotide on Metabolic Syndrome Risk in Patients With Bardet-Biedl Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab dgaf079. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf079.
  50. Haws RM, Joshi A, Shah SA, et al (2016) Renal transplantation in Bardet–Biedl Syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 31:2153–2161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3415-4.

ADPKD and IPMN: Mere Coincidence or Double Trouble?

Abstract

This article constitutes a review of the existing literature on the potential correlation between autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas. Additionally, it presents a clinical case where familiarity for both pathologies was observed, derived from the direct experience of our clinic, reinforcing the hypothesis of a possible common pathogenetic pathway. The review focuses on the potential genetic correlation between these two pathologies within the realm of ciliopathies, emphasizing the importance of targeted screening and monitoring strategies to detect pancreatic complications early in patients with ADPKD. Furthermore, it highlights the complexity in the clinical management of these rare conditions and underscores the importance of early diagnosis in optimizing clinical outcomes.

Keywords: ADPKD, IPMN, ciliopathies, polycystic diseases

Sorry, this entry is only available in Italiano.

Introduzione

La malattia del rene policistico autosomico dominante dell’adulto (ADPKD) è la malattia renale geneticamente determinata più frequente e la quarta causa di terapia dialitica sostitutiva nel mondo. Essa è caratterizzata dallo sviluppo di molteplici cisti nei reni e in vari altri organi. Le principali caratteristiche dell’ADPKD includono l’aumento del volume renale in toto e la perdita progressiva della funzione renale [1].

La maggior parte dei casi di ADPKD è dovuta a mutazioni nei geni PKD1 e PKD2, che codificano per le proteine policistina 1 e policistina 2. Queste proteine formano un complesso recettore-canale espresso nella membrana cellulare plasmatica e nella membrana primaria delle ciglia apicali; ADPKD, pertanto, è classificata come una ciliopatia [1]. Le ciliopatie sono un gruppo di disturbi causati da difetti nella struttura o nella funzione delle ciglia. Queste condizioni derivano da mutazioni ereditarie che influenzano la formazione delle ciglia primarie e le vie di segnalazione ad esse correlate. In ADPKD lesioni cistiche possono formarsi in altri distretti come il fegato, la milza e il pancreas [24].

La severità di espressione della malattia correla con il tipo di mutazione genetica. I pazienti con mutazioni sul gene PKD2 generalmente presentano una forma più lieve di malattia renale rispetto a quelli con mutazioni sul gene PKD1, in particolare rispetto ai portatori delle cosiddette mutazioni PKD1 troncanti [5].

Alström syndrome, a rare cause of renal failure: case report and review of the literature

Abstract

We describe the case of a 26-year-old male patient with a previous diagnosis of Alström Syndrome who presented drowsiness, dyspnea, tremors, and a dull abdominal pain, without signs of peritoneal irritation. The patient also presented sensorineural hearing loss, decreased vision, due to chorioretinal dystrophy, difficulty walking with back-lumbar double curve scoliosis, impaired glycemic homeostasis, and a significant deterioration of renal function.

Alström syndrome is a multisystem disease characterized by rod-cone dystrophy, hearing loss, obesity, insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dilated cardiomyopathy, and progressive renal and hepatic dysfunction. Around 450 cases have been identified worldwide. Clinical signs, age of onset and severity can vary significantly between different families and within the same family.

Careful nephrological follow-up is necessary in patients with syndromic ciliopathies, since long-term kidney problems can have an impact on other diseases, eg. cardiovascular disease.

Keywords: rare diseases, ciliopathies, chronic kidney failure

Sorry, this entry is only available in Italiano.

Introduzione

La sindrome di Alström, descritta per la prima volta nel 1959, è una malattia multisistemica caratterizzata da distrofia dei coni-bastoncelli, perdita dell’udito, obesità, resistenza all’insulina e iperinsulinemia, diabete mellito tipo 2, cardiomiopatia dilatativa (CMD), disfunzione renale ed epatica progressiva. A livello mondiale sono stati diagnosticati circa 450 casi. I segni clinici, l’età di esordio e la gravità possono variare significativamente tra le diverse famiglie e all’interno della stessa famiglia.

 

Descrizione del caso clinico

Il paziente è un maschio di 26 anni affetto Sindrome di Alström esordita in età neonatale. Il paziente è primogenito, nato a termine da parto spontaneo dopo una gravidanza normocondotta. Dall’età di 2 mesi il bambino presentava sonnolenza in ambiente luminoso. All’età di 4 mesi praticava una visita ambulatoriale presso l’Ospedale Pediatrico Regionale dove veniva riscontrato un accorciamento del muscolo sternocleidomastoideo destro, per cui veniva prescritta immobilizzazione del rachide cervicale in flessione per 1 mese; una visita oculistica riscontrava refrazione ipermetropica e nistagmo bilaterale. Effettuava poi una visita neurologica per approfondimento diagnostico, con PEV e EEG nella norma. A 20 mesi, insorgeva fotofobia e si effettuava una PEV di controllo che evidenziava un ritardo di conduzione troncoencefalica. Successivamente, a 8 anni, venivano diagnosticate l’insufficienza renale, il diabete iperinsulinemico e la sordità neurosensoriale. All’età di 10 anni la diagnosi di Sindrome di Alström veniva confermata dall’analisi molecolare del gene ALMS1 (omozigosi per la mutazione C11460G nell’esone 16).

I suoi genitori sono sani ed ha un fratello affetto anch’egli da Sindrome di Alström. Nel corso degli anni il paziente, seguito presso il centro di riferimento regionale per le malattie rare, ha effettuato regolari visite di controllo (visita oculistica, cardiologica, endocrinologica, dermatologica, neuropsichiatrica e nefrologica) e controlli strumentali (ecografia addome ed ecocardiogramma). Tale monitoraggio era finalizzato al controllo delle varie manifestazioni della Sindrome. Infatti, il paziente presentava ipoacusia neurosensoriale, diminuzione del visus da distrofia corioretinica, difficoltà di deambulazione con scoliosi a doppia curva dorso-lombare ed alterazione dell’omeostasi glicemica.

Giungeva alla nostra osservazione per comparsa di stato soporoso, dispnea, tremori e dolore addominale sordo senza segni di irritazione peritoneale. Da due giorni era in trattamento con ceftriaxone 1 gr/die per riferita bronchite con febbre. All’ingresso in ospedale i suoi parametri erano: SpO2 97%, P.A. 130/70 mmHg, polsi isosfigmici. L’esame obiettivo evidenziava addome poco trattabile e, al torace, mv aspro con crepitii consensuali. Gli esami di laboratorio erano: Azotemia 309 mg/dl; Creatininemia 22,8 mg/dl; Glicemia 184 mg/dl; Sodio 132 mEq/l; Potassio 5.0 mEq/L; Calcemia 8,6 mg/dl; Fosforemia 11.0 mg/dl; Amilasi 927 UI/L; Lipasi 4306 UI/L; CK-MB(massa) 6,2 ng/ml; Troponina I 0,10 ng/ml; Colesterolo totale 122 mg/dl; Trigliceridi 210 mg/dl; G.B. 27400/mmc; G.R. 4210000/mmc; HGB 11,1 gr/dl; HCT 34,3 %; PLT 207000/mmc. L’emogasanalisi arteriosa mostrava acidosi metabolica con eccesso di basi -19,8 mmol/L.

Il nefrologo chiamato in consulenza urgente dava indicazione al trattamento dialitico immediato tramite incannulamento ecoguidato della vena femorale sinistra con catetere bilume 11.5 Fr/Ch (3.8 mm) x 19.5 cm. Durante il ricovero venivano praticati ulteriori esami ematochimici, ecografia addominale, emogasanalisi, TC encefalo, TC torace e addome, e colangio- RM. L’ecografia renale evidenziava: reni bilateralmente ai limiti bassi per volumetria (D.L. dx 7,5 cm, D.L. sin 8 cm), ridotto spessore parenchimale ed iperecogenicità corticale. Inoltre, è stato effettuato l’ecocardiogramma per valutare la possibilità di una cardiomiopatia dilatativa e tale esame ha dato esito negativo. Tali ulteriori indagini e l’anamnesi patologica remota ci hanno orientato per una cronicità della insufficienza renale; pertanto il paziente è stato immesso in un programma di dialisi cronica. I trattamenti emodialitici sono stati effettuati con dializzatore in polietersulfone Revaclear 300 avente superficie di 1,4 mq. Dopo il secondo trattamento emodialitico si assisteva ad un drastico miglioramento del sensorio. Come riportato in letteratura anche il caso osservato presentava inoltre pancreatite acuta associata, con riscontro di alterazioni della crasi lipidica (ipertrigliceridemia) e con aspetto TAC caratteristico (Fig. 1).

Figura 1: Aspetto tumefatto della coda del pancreas ed imbibizione della fascia pararenale anteriore di sinistra
Figura 1: Aspetto tumefatto della coda del pancreas ed imbibizione della fascia pararenale anteriore di sinistra

Le pancreatiti in questi pazienti possono essere pericolose per la vita. È stato inoltre esclusa una genesi litiasica. Gli esami colturali e di laboratorio hanno escluso una sepsi con disfunzione multi organo. Il trattamento della pancreatite, con digiuno ed idratazione, nonché il trattamento sostitutivo della funzione renale, hanno permesso la risoluzione della pancreatite ed un sostanziale miglioramento dell’outcome del paziente.

 

Discussione

La sindrome di Alström è una rara sindrome autosomica recessiva ereditaria causata da una mutazione in entrambe le copie del gene ALMS1 localizzato sul cromosoma 2 (regione 2p13.1) e comprendente 23 esoni [2]. La proteina ALMS1 è un componente del centrosoma alla base delle ciglia;risulta formata da 4169 Aa e partecipa all’assemblaggio del materiale pericentriorale (Fig. 2). Sebbene l’esatta funzione biologica di ALMS1 rimanga oscura, l’evidenza attuale suggerisce che le funzioni includono il mantenimento della funzione ciliare, la modulazione del trasporto intracellulare e la differenziazione degli adipociti. Nel modello murino della sindrome, con proteina ALMS1 anomala, si evidenzia una perdita di ciglia nelle cellule tubulari prossimali mentre nei fotorecettori si ha accumulo di vescicole intracellulari [3].

Le mutazioni di geni che codificano per proteine del Ciglio Primario sono alla base di patologie definite ciliopatie. Le ciglia primarie sono organelli sensoriali che si trovano su molte cellule dell’uomo e svolgono ruoli critici nella comunicazione cellulare relativamente alla proliferazione e differenziazione, motilità e polarità cellulare [4]. Trattasi di un eterogeneo gruppo di disordini che interessano molteplici organi, compreso il rene. La malattia del rene policistico autosomico dominante (ADPKD) “rappresenta la ciliopatia più comune, e si presenta con caratteristiche cliniche uniche, specifiche. Ad essa si aggiungono la malattia del rene policistico autosomica recessiva (ARPKD), la nefronoftisi (NPHP), ed un gruppo di ciliopatie sindromiche caratterizzate da difetti renali ed extra-renali, come la distrofia retinica, il situs inversus, disturbi cognitivi e obesità. Tra queste ultime si annoverano la sindrome di Bardet-Biedl (BBS), la sindrome di Senior-Löken (SNLS), la sindrome di Meckel (MKS), la sindrome di Joubert (JBTS), la sindrome oro-facio-digitale di tipo 1 (OFD1), la distrofia toracica asfissiante di Jeune (JATD) e la sindrome di Alström (ALMS)” [5].

Struttura del cilio primario
Figura 2: Struttura del cilio primario. L’assonema è composto da nove paia di microtubuli ed è ancorato alla cellula mediante il corpo basale che è un centriolo modificato, costituito da nove triplette di microtubuli. Il centriolo madre gioca un ruolo chiave nella ciliogenesi, reclutando le molecole necessarie per l’allungamento degli assonemi. Il centriolo figlio risulta dalla duplicazione del centriolo madre durante la fase S della mitosi. Le frecce indicano gli elementi chiave del ciglio strutturale (l’assonema, la zona di transizione e corpo basale) e le proteine coinvolte nelle ciliopatie renali e nel carcinoma a cellule renali (RCC) (tradotto da Adamiok-Ostrowska) [3]
La sindrome è caratterizzata dall’insorgenza di obesità nell’infanzia o nell’adolescenza, diabete di tipo 2, spesso con grave insulino-resistenza, dislipidemia, ipertensione e grave fibrosi multiorgano che coinvolge fegato, reni e cuore. La sindrome di Alström è anche caratterizzata da una progressiva perdita della vista e dell’udito, una forma di malattia cardiaca che indebolisce il muscolo cardiaco (cardiomiopatia dilatativa) e bassa statura. Questo disturbo può anche causare problemi medici gravi o potenzialmente letali che coinvolgono fegato, reni, vescica e polmoni. Le manifestazioni cliniche della sindrome di Alström variano in gravità e non tutti gli individui affetti hanno tutte le caratteristiche associate al disturbo [1].

Le manifestazioni di danno renale si rendono evidenti soprattutto dopo la seconda-terza decade di vita e comprendono: diminuzione della capacità di concentrazione delle urine, ipertensione, acidosi tubulare renale, nefrocalcinosi disfunzione del tratto urinario inferiore, infezioni intercorrenti, reflusso vescico-ureterale e instabilità del detrusore [6]. Insufficienza renale terminale si verifica nel 50% dei pazienti Le cause dell’insufficienza Renale sono la fibrosi e l’’atrofia tubulare. Le  infiltrazioni fibrotiche sono alla base degli altri fenotipi clinici, in particolare cardiaco, polmonare ed epatico suggerendo meccanismi patogeni comuni [7]. Non c’è correlazione con il diabete o con la pielonefrite [8] in quanto sono assenti le caratteristiche istopatologiche della nefropatia diabetica e/o da reflusso suggerendo che la malattia renale possa essere la manifestazione primaria della sindrome anche se non si può escludere un effetto additivo sulla progressione del danno renale da parte del diabete e dell’ipertensione [9].

Prima della scoperta delle mutazioni ALMS1, la diagnosi di Sindrome di Alström era basata unicamente sul fenotipo, ma esso è molto variabile anche all’interno dei nuclei familiari. Pertanto, sono stati proposti criteri diagnostici specifici per età riportati in Tabella I [1012].

Criteri diagnostici di sindrome di Almstrom tradotto da Jan D Marshall 2007
Tabella I: Criteri diagnostici di sindrome di Almstrom tradotto da Jan D Marshall 2007 [10]
Tali criteri sono fondamentali per la diagnosi di sindrome di Almstrom, la cui diagnosi differenziale con altre patologie può essere complessa. Citiamo in particolare la Sindrome di Bartdet-Bieldl, che presenta molte analogie cliniche con la sindrome di Almstrom, dalla quale tuttavia si differenzia per la polidattilia e per la più bassa prevalenza di cardiomiopatia dilatativa nella BBS rispetto alla AS. oltre che per una diversa diagnosi molecolare [13].

 

Conclusioni

La sindrome di Alström è una rarissima malattia causa di insufficienza renale terminale necessitante di terapia dialitica. I pazienti raramente sopravvivono oltre i 40 anni. Al momento non c’è alcun trattamento specifico, ma diagnosi e interventi precoci possono rallentare la progressione delle espressioni fenotipiche migliorando il periodo di sopravvivenza e la qualità della vita dei pazienti.

 

Bibliografia

  1. Wu WC, Chen SC, Dia CY, Yu ML, Hsieh MY, Lin ZY, Wang LY, Tsai JF, Chang WY, Chuang WL. Alström syndrome with acute pancreatitis: a case report. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2003; 19(7):358-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70438-3
  2. Tahani N, Maffei P, Dollfus H, Paisey R, Valverde D, Milan G, et al. Consensus clinical management guidelines for Alström syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2020; 15(1):253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-01468-8
  3. Adamiok-Ostrowska A, Piekiełko-Witkowska A. Ciliary Genes in Renal Cystic Diseases Cells 2020; 9(4):907. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040907
  4. Dillman JR, Trout AT, Smith EA, Towbin AJ. Hereditary Renal Cystic Disorders: Imaging of the Kidneys and Beyond. Radiographics 2017; 37:924-46. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160148
  5. Cervesato A, Raucci R, Buononato D, Marchese E, Capolongo G, et al. La proteomica e la metabolomica nello studio delle malattie genetiche del rene: dai big data alla medicina di precisione. G Ital Nefrol 2020; 37(6):n5. https://giornaleitalianodinefrologia.it/2020/11/37-06-2020-05/
  6. Marshall JD, Maffei P, Collin GB, Naggert JK. Alström Syndrome: Genetics and Clinical Overview. Curr Genomics 2011; 12:225-35. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920211795677912
  7. Izzi C, Maffei P, Milan G, Tardanico R, Foini P, Marshall J, Marega A, Scolari F. The Case ∣ Familial occurrence of retinitis pigmentosa, deafness, and nephropathy. Kidney Int 2011; 79(6):691-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2010.514
  8. Medical Handbook. https://www.Alström.org.uk
  9. Baig S, Paisey R, Dawson C, Barrett T, Maffei P, Hodson J, Rambhatla SB, Chauhan P, Bolton S, Dassie F, Francomano C, Marshall RP, Belal M, Skordilis K, Hayer M, Price AM, Cramb R, Edwards N, Steeds RP, Geberhiwot T. Defining renal phenotype in Alström syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 35(6):994-1001. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy293
  10. Marshall JD, Beck S, Maffei P, Naggert JK. Alström syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet 2007; 15(12):1193-202. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201933
  11. Hearn T. ALMS1 and Alström syndrome: a recessive form of metabolic, neurosensory and cardiac deficits. J Mol Med (Berl) 2019; 97(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-018-1714-x
  12. Jaykumar AB, Caceres PS, King-Medina KN, Liao TD, Datta I, Maskey D, Naggert JK, Mendez M, Beierwaltes WH, Ortiz PA. Role of Alström syndrome 1 in the regulation of blood pressure and renal function. JCI Insight 2018; 3(21):e95076. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.95076
  13. Brühl P, Schwanitz G, Mallmann R, Müller SC, Raff R. Bardet-Biedl-Syndrom: nephrourologische und humangenetische Aspekte [Bardet-Biedl syndrome: aspects of nephro-urology and human genetics]. Klin Padiatr 2001; 213(1):8-12. German. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-1126

The renal lesions in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome: history before and after the discovery of BBS genes

Abstract

Various renal lesions of the Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) have been described, including macroscopic and microscopic kidney abnormalities, polyuria, polydipsia and chronic renal failure. However, these renal symptoms were completely overlooked for about fifty years after the first description of the syndrome. The observation of a familial origin of the syndrome began in 1753, with Maupertuis and Réaumur describing hereditary forms of polydactyly. In the early 19th century, Martin mentioned an inherited case of blindness. Subsequently, von Graefe (1858) reported on a familial occurrence of both of blindness and deafness. The introduction of the ophthalmoscope by von Helmholtz (1851) allowed for the identification of patients with retinal degeneration. Systematically using this instrument, Laurence and Moon (1866) were the first to describe a familial case of retinal degeneration combined with obesity and cognitive impairment. Due to the influential work of Froehlich, Cushing, and Babinski, attention then shifted to obesity. The syndrome was definitively identified by 1920 through Bardet’s observations familial cases of obesity, blindness, polydactyly, and hypogonadism. Biedl in 1922 observed further cases of the syndrome. In recognition of this history, the disease was named Laurence-Moon-Bardet-Biedl Syndrome. The renal anomalies were not described until fifty years later, in 1977. In 1993, the quest for the genes involved in BBS began with the isolation of 21 different genes. In 2003 two concepts emerged: the existence of a spectrum of ‘ciliopathies’ and the concept of the BBSome. Afterwards, the gene-phenotype relationship was researched using transgenic mice.

Keywords: ciliopathies, hereditary, obesity, retinitis, chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

According to the influential theory of Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) (1), most scientists work constrained by current influential paradigm and are devoted to solving small problems (‘puzzle-solving’). The dominant paradigm is important for the interpretation of the data, but it may blind scientists to new phenomena not considered part of the paradigm. One example of this theory comes from the field of nephrology, where the pivotal renal anomalies in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome went completely unnoticed for more than 50 years after the discovery of the syndrome. Tus, the BBS syndrome is an example of how an essential clinical element may go unnoticed for a long time and is evaluated only after a shift in the attention of the scientific community (specifically, the introduction of renal biopsy and immunofluorescence).

The Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (BBS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by retinal degeneration, polydactyly, obesity, learning disabilities, hypogonadism and renal anomalies. Various renal lesions of BBS have been described including (i) fetal lobulation (ii) calyceal clubbing, (iii) focal sclerosing glomerulonephritis, (iv) interstitial nephritis, and (v) changes in the glomerular basement membrane. Polyuria, polydipsia and chronic renal failure have been also reported in many case reports (2). Although the renal anomalies are today one of the primary features of the disease, it took almost 50 years after the description of the syndrome for renal symptomatology to be included.

Here we will review the observations that drew the attention of Bardet and Biedl to the disease and why the renal features were not observed. Afterwards, we will focus on the role that the identification of BBS genes played in changing our perception of the disease and its renal lesions. A timetable of the discoveries is summarized in Table 1.

 

HOW THE SYNDROME WAS DISCOVERED

The identification of BBS required the evolution of the following concepts: 1) the existence of hereditary forms of blindness and polydactyly, which fostered the search for combined hereditary forms of more complex diseases 2) the invention of the ophthalmoscope, which allowed scientists to identify and classify retinal degeneration and 3) a paradigm-shift concerning the nature of obesity, which focused attention on hereditary forms of obesity (such as BBS), but also served as a blinder impeding the identification of other features such as kidney failure.

The observation of a familial origin of the syndrome began in 1753, with Maupertuis and Réaumur (Figure 1, Figure 2) describing hereditary polydactyly. While polydactyly was widely known since ancient times, the hereditary aspect of the malformation gained notice in the late 1700s. Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis, (born Sept. 28, 1698, Saint-Malo, France—died July 27, 1759, Basel, Switz.), was a mathematician and astronomer who popularized Newton’s theories (3). In Système de la nature ou Essai sur les corps organisés (1751) he studied the transmission of polydactyly in four generations of a Berlin family, providing the first report of the trait as hereditary (4). Renè-Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur (1683-1757), the famous French scientist who gave his name to the temperature scale, is reported by Huxley (1894-1963) (5) to have analyzed data from three families (named Kelleia) from Malta with hereditary polydactyly. Similar to polydactyly, progressive blindness was also known since ancient times; however, the possibility of a hereditary form of blindness was first noted in the early 19th century by Martin. He reported, in the Baltimore Medical and Physical Recorder (1809), on the Lecomptes, a Maryland family of French origin whose members suffered progressive blindness (5). While none of these authors were describing actual cases of BBS, their work did refocus subsequent researchers on hereditary forms of polydactyly and blindness.

Indeed, soon after, Albrecht von Graefe (1828-1870) (6) and thereafter Liebreich first reported a hereditary combination of blindness and deafness in cases of what would be called retinitis pigmentosa, furthering the concept of combined forms of hereditary traits, and these observations are, in fact, cited by Laurence and Moon in their work (see below). Another essential discovery that must be acknowledged for the history of BBS was the invention of the ophthalmoscope in 1851 by Hermann von Helmholtz (1821-1894), which allowed the observation of the retina and hence the definition of retinitis pigmentosa (Figure 3). The use of the new device, the ophthalmoscope, was hence promoted in England by John Zachariah Laurence (1829-1870), a surgeon and ophthalmologist at the ophthalmologic hospital in Southwark (Figure 4). In 1866, together with his colleague Robert Charles Moon (1844-1914) (Figure 5), a house surgeon at the same hospital (who then moved in Philadelphia), they were the first to describe, using the ophthalmoscope, a familial case of combined retinal degeneration, obesity, and cognitive impairment (7).

In the first years of the 20th century, medical attention shifted to hypothalamic forms of obesity-hypogonadism thanks to the work of a neurologist, Joseph Babinski (1857-1932), a pharmacologist, Alfred Fröhlich (1871-1953) (8) and a neurosurgeon, Harvey Cushing (1869-1939) (9). Again, in the history of science, we see how important advances in one field may come through collaborations with other fields, and how this chance partnership was a necessary step in fully defining BBS. Fröhlich’s strong influence is visible when the first report of a BBS case was attributed to a pituitary malfunction.

Around this period a certain number of observations of obesity, polydactyly and retinitis pigmentosa are reported by several authors: in 1887 Ferdinand-Jean Darier (1856-1938) reports the association of retinitis pigmentosa and polydactyly (10). In 1989 Elie von Cyon (also known as de Cyon, 1843-1912) presents the case of a 12-year old boy with obesity, growth and mental retardation, and hereditary polydactyly (11). In 1898 Ed Fournier reports retinitis pigmentosa and syndactyly (12). In 1913 Rozabel Farnes reports adipose-genital syndrome with polydactyly (13). In 1914 an Italian radiologist working in Naples, Mario Bertolotti (1876-1957) presented the case of Marguerite Catt, 39 years old, with polydactyly, mental retardation, obesity, retinitis pigmentosa, and hypogonadism (14). In 1918 J Madigan and Thomas Verner Moore (1877-1969) described a case of mental retardation, obesity, hypogonadism, retinitis pigmentosa, and tapering toes (15).
Finally, in 1920 a French medical student, George Louise Bardet (1885-1966), in his medical degree thesis, collected all these cases and his own observation of a familial case of obesity, hexadactyly, retinitis pigmentosa and hypogonadism and proposed the existence of a triad (13). He discussed this finding using the current paradigm of hypophyseal/hypothalamic obesity: “Two congenital malformations (hexadactyly and retinitis pigmentosa) in a child who became obese from birth. What is the gland which can be incriminated? (…) We believe this case must be attached to a very special clinical variety of hypophysis obesity”. Bardet’s triad (obesity, polydactyly, retinitis pigmentosa) gained success after the father of modern endocrinology, Arthur Biedl (1869-1933), in 1922 observed further cases of the syndrome. Biedl named the syndrome adipose-genital dystrophy and thought it was of cerebral origin, in line with the paradigms of that period (Figure 6). In recognition of this history, the disease was named Laurence-Moon-Bardet-Biedl Syndrome. Later, thanks to the work of Ammann in 1970 and Schachat and Maumenee in 1982, Laurence-Moon and Bardet-Biedl Syndromes came to be considered two different entities and possibly part of the same disease spectrum. In the first half of 1900, BBS was officially defined, but none of these authors noticed abnormalities in kidney function, which is today acknowledged as an important signature of the syndrome.
Why then were the renal features of the syndrome missed for almost 50 years? It is tempting to see this as an example of Kuhn’s hypothesis that scientists work on ‘puzzle-solving’ within an influential paradigm. The paradigm of that period was hypothalamic obesity, whereas kidney failure was not considered. Scientists observing new cases of BBS focused on obesity and dismissed other possible features of the disease.
It is intriguing that, even in 1995, in the excellent editorial by George Bray (born 1931) on the syndrome in Obesity Research, kidney dysfunction is completely ignored by the author (16).

 

THE RENAL LESIONS BEFORE BBS GENES

Awareness of the renal involvement in BBS starts in the late 1960s with the work of McLoughlin and Shanklin (17), Nadjmi (18), Hurley (19) and Falkner (20). McLoughlin and Shanklin (17), Nadjmi et al. (18) first reviewed necropsies of BBS from the literature and found a high incidence of renal/genitourinary malformations; Nadjmi further observed that most of cases reported in the literature since 1940 died for uremia and therefore renal failure was a major cause of early death in BBS patients. According to Nadjmi, the first autopsy reporting a BBS subject passed due to uremia was by Radner in 1940 (Acta Med Scand 105:141); however, genitourinary tract malformations were already observed since 1938 by Griffiths (J Neurol Psychiat 1:1-6), and Riggs (Arch Neurol Psychiat 39:1041). It is possible that the systematic renal involvement in BBS was missed before because the histologic classification of kidney diseases reached its maturity only when kidney biopsy and the kidney immunofluorescence have been available around 1950, thus driving attention to this organ.

The diffusion of the technique of percutaneous kidney biopsy by Nils Alwall (1904-1986) allowed Hurley et al (19) to first report histological data from a series of nine BBS children (Figure 7 A-B). The results were quite variable, from mesangial proliferation to sclerosis, cystic dilatation of the tubules, cortical and medullary cysts, periglomerular and interstitial fibrosis, chronic inflammation.

Falkner et al. (20) found in a 24-month old child with BBS right sided vesical-ureteral reflux, cystocele, urinary tract infections, growth arrest of the right kidney. They also confirm the mesangial hypercellularity by percutaneous biopsy (Figure 7 C).

In 1990 the incidence of renal abnormalities in BBS was finally determined to be very high: up to 90% of the patients, and therefore become a new signature of the syndrome, more than 50 years from its initial definition (2). In the meanwhile, the spectrum of renal abnormalities was stably defined as:

Functional: polyuria, polydipsia, aminoaciduria, reduction of maximum concentrating capacity, chronic renal failure, hypertension

Macroscopic: fetal lobulation, cystic dysplasia and calyceal cysts, small kidneys, calyceal clubbing or blunting

Microscopic: swelling of endothelial cells, tubular and interstitial nephritis with glomerulosclerosis.

In conclusion, we believe that the attention to the nephrological character of the BBS was finally reached only when (i) technical advancements were available (that is the invention of the percutaneous biopsy) and (ii) when a general attention of the medical entourage was driven towards the kidney function: we should remind that in 1943 Willem Johan Kolff (1911 – 2009) first built a dialyzer machine, further developed by Nils Alwall. At the end of 60’ nephrology was a mature science and the greater awareness towards uremia led to a revision of syndromic diseases.

However, the condition remained largely unclear even after the discovery of the renal abnormalities: major advances in a new behind the complex trait was the discovery of the gene defects causing BBS.

 

THE RENAL LESIONS AFTER BBS GENES

The quest for the genes occurred in two phases: from 1993 to 2000 a genetic mapping was pursued, with the identification of several DNA loci involved in the disease. In 2000 the identification of the first BBS gene (now they number 21), MKKS, based on the similarity between the BBS and the McKusick-Kaufman syndrome (MKS), occurred (21). In 2003 Ansley et al demonstrated that mammalian BBS8 gene was restricted to ciliated cells (21). This finding raised the hypothesis that BBS proteins play a role in cilia function. Meanwhile, other genes of the same family were found to cause BBS, with at least 17 different genes implicated up to now.

The field was quite mature at the time because a second, more common condition, was already found to involve cilia: the polycystic kidney disease (PKD). This is also a hereditary condition and followed almost the same path of BBS (anatomical period-genetic period-functional period), which ultimately led to the paradigm of the involvement of cilia dysfunction in the genesis of the disease.

It should be stressed that, again, the major advancement in the paradigm did not come directly from the studies on the disease, but from studies on flagellated protozoa: it was a genetic study on immobile forms of these protozoa which led to the identification of this gene. When the same was found to be involved in PKD and then in other diseases such as BBS, it was almost immediate the formation of a new paradigm of ‘ciliopathies’. All genes involved in these genetic diseases and in the cilium were then functionally grouped in a multiprotein complex called BBSome.

After the period of discovery of BBS genes and the construction of the concept of the BBSome, some new insights in the renal pathology of BBS have been addressed. First, the gene-phenotype relationship has been studied in much detail, with a categorization of mutations leading to various associations of the visual, metabolic and kidney phenotypes (23, 24). Second, a number of transgenic mice are now available for testing of pathogenic hypotheses and new pharmacological approaches. Risk factors for the development of the renal disease have been studied in large cohorts (22 – 24), and the usefulness of renal transplantation has been demonstrated in a separate study (25, 26). A contribution for low protein diet in the preservation of renal function in BBS has also been reported (27). Finally, a study from one of us (28, 29) showed combined impaired water handling in BBS.

These functional changes in BBS kidney might be mediated, at least in part, by mistrafficking of apical membrane proteins, leading to tubular dysfunction (41). In turn, this might be related to the renal hyposthenuria in BBS, that has been recognized as the most common renal dysfunction in the absence of renal insufficiency (42, 43).

 

Acknowledgments

I am indebted with dr. David Widmer, who critically reviewed the manuscript, with useful suggestions and critiques.

 

REFERENCES
  1. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1996.
  2. Regenbogen L, Eliahou H. Diseases affecting the eye and the kidney. Karger; 1993.
  3. The Editors of Encyclopædia E. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis (Internet). 1998.. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Pierre-Louis-Moreau-de-Maupertuis
  4. Cobb M. Hereditary before genetics: a history. Nat. Rev Genet. 2006;7:953–8.
  5. Harper P. A short history of medical genetics. Oxford press; 2008.
  6. von Graefe A. Vereinzelte Beobachtungen und Bemerkungen: Exeptionelles Verhalten des Gesichtfeldes bei Pigmentartung der Netzhaut. Arch. für Klin. und Exp. Ophthalmol. 1858;4:250–3.
  7. Laurence J, Moon RC. Four cases of retinitis pigmentosa occurring in the same family accompanied by general imperfection of development. Ophthalmic Rev. 1866;2:32–41.
  8. Fröhlich A. Ein Fall von Tumor der Hypophysis cerebri ohne Akromegalie (A case involving a tumor of the hypophysis cerebri without acromegaly). Wiener Klin. Rundschau. 1901;15:833–6; 906–8.
  9. Cushing H. The basophil adenomas of the pituitary body and their clinical manifestations (pituitary basophilism). Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1932;50:137–95 Reprinted in: Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 44.
  10. Darier F-J. Observation VI. Ophtalmol. Arch. 1887;174. Cited in: Bardet G, 1920.
  11. De Cyon E.Traitement de l’acromégalie par l’hypophysine. Bull. De l’Acad. de Med. Paris. 1898; 11:444. Cited in: Bardet, 1920.
  12. Fouriner E. case #328. These de Paris; 1898. Cited in: Bardet, 1920.
  13. Bardet G. Sur un Syndrome d ’Obésité Congénitale avec Polydactylie et Retinite Pigmentaire (Contribution a l’etude des formes clinique de l’Obésité hypophysaire). Thése Paris No 470. Paris: Translated in: Obesity Res 1995 3:387; 1920.
  14. Bertolotti M. Polydactyly arrested in development of members and concomitant hypophysis dystrophy. J. Acad. Med. Torrino. 1914;6.
  15. Madigan JJ., Moore TV. DYSTROPHIA ADIPOSOGENITALIS (FRÖHLICH’S SYNDROME)REPORT OF CASE. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1918;70:669-71. Cited in Bardet, 1920.
  16. 16. Bray G. Laurence Moon Bardet and Biedl: reflections on a syndrome. Obes Res. 1995;3:383–6.
  17. McLoughlin T, Shanklin D. Pathology of Laurence-Moon-Bardet-Biedl syndrome. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 1967;93:65–79.
  18. Nadjmi B, Flanagan M, Christian J. Laurence-Moon-Biedl syndrome associated with multiple genito-urinary tract anomalies. Am J Dis Child. 1969;117:352–6.
  19. Hurley R, Dery P, Nogrady M, Drummond K. The renal lesion of the Laurence-Moon-Biedl syndrome. J Pediatr. 1975;87:206–9.
  20. Falkner B, Langam C, Katz S. Renal histopathological changes in a child with Laurence-Moon-Biedl syndrome. J Clin Pathol. 1977;30:1077–81.
  21. Lupski JR, Katsanis N, Beales PL, Woods MO, Lewis RA, Green JS, et al. Mutations in MKKS cause obesity, retinal dystrophy and renal malformations associated with Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2000;26:67–70.
  22. König J, Kranz B, König S, Schlingmann KP, Titieni A, Tönshoff B, et al. Phenotypic Spectrum of Children with Nephronophthisis and Related Ciliopathies. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017;CJN.01280217.
  23. Esposito G, Testa F, Zacchia M, Crispo AA, Di Iorio V, Capolongo G et al.. Genetic characterization of Italian patients with Bardet-Biedl syndrome and correlation to ocular, renal and audio-vestibular phenotype: identification of eleven novel pathogenic sequence variants. BMC Med. Genet. 2017;18(1):10.
  24. Stoetzel C, Laurier V, Faivre L, Mégarbané A, Perrin-Schmitt F, Verloes A, et al. BBS8 is rarely mutated in a cohort of 128 Bardet–Biedl syndrome families. J. Hum. Genet. 2006;51:81–4.
  25. Hooda A, Karan S, Bishnoi J, Nandwani A, Sinha T. Renal transplant in a child with Bardet-Biedl syndrome: A rare cause of end-stage renal disease. Indian J. Nephrol. 2009;19:112.
  26. Sharifian M, Dadkhah-Chimeh M, Einollahi B, Nafar M, Simforoush N, Basiri A, et al. Renal transplantation in patients with Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Arch. Iran. Med. 2007;10:339–42.
  27. Dervisoglu E, Isgoren S, Kasgari D, Demir H, Yilmaz A. Obesity control and low protein diet preserve or even improve renal functions in Bardet-Biedl syndrome: a report of two cases. Med. Sci. Monit. 2011;17:CS12–4.
  28. Zacchia M, Zacchia E, Zona E, Capolongo G, Raiola I, Rinaldi L, et al. Renal phenotype in Bardet-Biedl syndrome: a combined defect of urinary concentration and dilution is associated with defective urinary AQP2 and UMOD excretion. Am. J. Physiol. – Ren. Physiol. 2016;311:F686–94.
  29. Zacchia M, Di Iorio V, Trepiccione F, Caterino M, Capasso G. The Kidney in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome: Possible Pathogenesis of Urine Concentrating Defect. Kidney Dis. 2017;3:57–65.
  30. Gourdol O, David L, Colon S, Bouvier R, Ayral A, Aguercif M, et al. Renal involvement in the Laurence-Moon-Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Apropos of 3 cases. Pediatrie. 1984;39:175–81.
  31. Kwitek-Black AE, Carmi R, Duyk GM, Buetow KH, Elbedour K, Parvari R, et al. Linkage of Bardet-Biedl syndrome to chromosome 16q and evidence for non-allelic genetic heterogeneity. Nat. Genet. 1993;5:392–6.
  32. Leppert M, Baird L, Anderson KL, Otterud B, Lupski JR, Lewis RA. Bardet-Biedl syndrome is linked to DNA markers on chromosome 11q and is genetically heterogeneous. Nat. Genet. 1994;7:108–12.
  33. Sheffield VC, Carmi R, Kwitek-Black A, Rokhlina T, Nishimura D, Duyk GM, et al. Identification of a Bardet-Biedl syndrome locus on chromosome 3 and evaluation of an efficient approach to homozygosity mapping. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1994;3:1331–5.
  34. Carmi R, Rokhlina T, Kwitek-Black AE, Elbedour K, Nishimura D, Stone EM, et al. Use of a DNA pooling strategy to identify a human obesity syndrome locus on chromosome 15. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1995;4:9–13.
  35. Pazour GJ, Dickert BL, Vucica Y, Seeley ES, Rosenbaum JL, Witman GB, et al. Chlamydomonas IFT88 and its mouse homologue, polycystic kidney disease gene tg737, are required for assembly of cilia and flagella. J. Cell Biol. 2000;151:709–18.
  36. Ansley SJ, Badano JL, Blacque OE, Hill J, Hoskins BE, Leitch CC, et al. Basal body dysfunction is a likely cause of pleiotropic Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Nature. 2003;425:628–33.
  37. Blacque OE, Reardon MJ, Li C, McCarthy J, Mahjoub MR, Ansley SJ, et al. Loss of C. elegans BBS-7 and BBS-8 protein function results in cilia defects and compromised intraflagellar transport. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1630–42.
  38. Moore SJ, Green JS, Fan Y, Bhogal AK, Dicks E, Fernandez BA, et al. Clinical and genetic epidemiology of Bardet-Biedl syndrome in Newfoundland: a 22-year prospective, population-based, cohort study. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2005;132A:352–60.
  39. Badano JL, Mitsuma N, Beales PL, Katsanis N. The Ciliopathies: An Emerging Class of Human Genetic Disorders. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2006;7:125–48.
  40. Seo S, Baye LM, Schulz NP, Beck JS, Zhang Q, Slusarski DC, et al. BBS6, BBS10, and BBS12 form a complex with CCT/TRiC family chaperonins and mediate BBSome assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010;107:1488–93.
  41. Zacchia M, Esposito G, Carmosino M, Barbieri C, Zacchia E, Crispo AA et al. Knockdown of the BBS10 Gene Product Affects Apical Targeting of AQP2in Renal Cells: A Possible Explanation for the Polyuria Associated with Bardet-Biedl Syndrome. Genet Syndr. Gene Ther 2014; 5:3.
  42. Zona E, Zacchia M, Di Iorio V, Capolongo G, Rinaldi L, Capasso G. Patho-physiology of renal dysfunction in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome. G Ital Nefrol 2017; 34: 62-72.
  43. Zacchia M, Capolongo G, Trepiccione F, Marion V. Impact of Local and Systemic Factors on Kidney Dysfunction in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2017 ;42:784-793.
  44. Sorsby A. John Zachariah Laurence-A belated tribute. Br. J. Ophtalmol. 1932; 16:727-40.