Glomerulopatia da fibronectina: case report di glomerulonefrite membranoproliferativa

Abstract

Background. La glomerulopatia da fibronectina (FNG) è una rara glomerulopatia autosomica dominante caratterizzata da proteinuria, ematuria, ipertensione e perdita progressiva della funzione renale fino all’insufficienza renale terminale (ESRD) in un periodo di 15-20 anni. La malattia è causata da mutazioni nel gene FN1. Attualmente non esiste un trattamento specifico.
Caso clinico. Una donna di 22 anni mostrava proteinuria sub-nefrosica ed ematuria microscopica. La biopsia renale evidenziava espansione mesangiale e depositi densi, compatibili con FNG. Il test genetico ha confermato una mutazione nel gene FN1 (c.5773T>A, W1925R). Non sono stati riscontrati segni di malattia renale nei genitori della paziente; successivamente il fratello è risultato positivo alla stessa mutazione genetica. È stata trattata con ACE-inibitori e dieta iposodica. Dopo 3 anni, la funzione renale si è mantenuta stabile, con creatinina sierica di 0,5 mg/dL e proteinuria ridotta a 0.7 g/24h.
Discussione. La FNG è causata da mutazioni nel gene FN1, con depositi renali anomali di fibronectina. Non esiste un trattamento mirato, ma la terapia conservativa con ACE-inibitori può aiutare a rallentare la progressione della malattia. L’utilizzo di terapia steroidea è controverso, con successi limitati nel prevenire l’ESRD.
Conclusione. La diagnosi precoce ed il trattamento conservativo sono cruciali per la gestione della FNG. Sono necessari ulteriori studi per chiarire le terapie efficaci e comprendere meglio la progressione della malattia.

Parole chiave: glomerulopatia da Fibronectina, mutazione FN1, proteinuria, biopsia renale, terapia conservativa, ESRD

Ci spiace, ma questo articolo è disponibile soltanto in inglese.

Background

Fibronectin glomerulopathy (FNG) is a rare autosomal dominant glomerulopathy that manifests at various ages in both sexes [1]. Common clinical features are mild proteinuria and varying degrees of hematuria, hypertension and slow progression to end-stage renal disease over 15–20 years [1]. Decline of kidney function over time is variable. Serum fibronectin levels are usually normal, and systemic manifestations have not been reported. Recurrence in the transplant may occur [2].

Currently, there is no specific treatment for fibronectin glomerulopathy.

 

Case report

A 22-year-old Italian female presented to our department for evaluation of sub-nephrotic proteinuria without edema. She didn’t take any medications and her medical history was indifferent. Her blood pressure was 120/80 mmHg, heart rate 85bpm. Blood chemistry tests showed BUN 17 mg/dL, serum creatinine 0,6 mg/dL. Her estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 120 mL/min/1.73m2, as calculated using the CKD-EPI equation; urinalysis revealed proteinuria and microscopic hematuria in dipstick; the 24-hour urine collection showed urine total protein of 1700 mg/day (Table 1).

Blood test
White Blood Cell 9400 /μL
Hemoglobin 12.3 g/dL
Platelet 303×103/μL
Total protein 6.3 g/dL
Albumin 3.6 g/dL
Urea nitrogen 17 mg/dL
Creatinine 0.6 mg/dL
eGFR 120 mL/min/1.73m2
Cholesterol 194 mg/dL
HDL/LDL 58/120 mg/dL
Triglycerides 154 mg/dL
C-reactive protein 0.05 mg/dL

 

Immunoserology
IgG 996 mg/dL
IgA 346 mg/dL
IgM 230 mg/dL
Complement 3 136 mg/dL
Complement 4 23 mg/dL
ANA neg
Anti-GBM antibody neg
MPO-ANCA neg
PR3-ANCA neg
PLA2R neg
HBs-Ag
HCV-Ab

 

Urinalysis
specific gravity 1.020
pH 6.2
Red Blood Cell 5-10/high power
Protein 1700mg/24h
Table 1. Laboratory data from initial admission.

Renal ultrasound showed kidneys with normal size and increased parenchymal echogenicity.

A renal biopsy was performed: immunofluorescent staining revealed mild glomerular deposition of IgA, C3 and Lambda while the results for IgG, IgM, C4, Kappa and Fibrinogen were negative. Light microscopy examination detected thirteen glomeruli one of which was sclerotic. The other glomeruli had normal size, exhibited significant mesangial expansion and lobular accentuation, normal glomerular basement membranes, thickening of Bowman’s capsule without extracapillar proliferation. The renal tubular epithelial cells were vacuolated, and there were no pathological changes in the renal interstitium, it appeared edematous with diffuse inflammatory infiltrates. (Figure 1, 2, 3 e 4)

Congo-red staining was negative for amyloid; electron microscopy showed mesangial and subendothelial electron-dense deposits (EDD) with high density, mostly granular with focal fibrillary substructure (Figura 5).

Immunohistochemistry for CD3 showed strong positive staining in the interstitial inflammatory infiltrate while immunohistochemistry for CD20 and CD138 were negative. Also immunohistochemistry for DNAJB9 was negative.

Genetic testing of whole-blood samples (using the Sanger method) revealed an FN1 gene mutation with a thymine changed to adenine at nucleotide 5773 of the complementary DNA (c.5773T>A) causing a substitution in which the tryptophan at amino acid 1925 is replaced by arginine (W1925R).

The conclusive diagnosis was Fibronectin glomerulopathy (FNG).

Family history was investigated. The patient’s brother had never undergone nephrological evaluation before. Following sister’s diagnosis of the disease, he underwent urinalysis, which revealed proteinuria and microscopic hematuria too – in normal renal function; consequently, genetic testing was performed, confirming the same pathogenic mutation identified in his sister (W1925R).

None of the patient’s parents showed renal disease or proteinuria; her father died young without apparent cause.

The patient started conservative therapy with ACE-I and low salt diet. Three years after kidney biopsy, serum creatinine was 0.5 mg/dL (eGFR 125 mL/min/1.73m2) and proteinuria reduced to 0.7g/24h, chemistry panel was unchanged.

Hematoxylin and eosin staining: increased mesangial matrix, renal interstitium appeares edematous with inflammatory infiltrate.
Figure 1. Hematoxylin and eosin staining: increased mesangial matrix, renal interstitium appeares edematous with inflammatory infiltrate.
Periodic acid–Schiff staining shows PAS–positive material expanding the mesangium
Figure 2. Periodic acid–Schiff staining shows PAS–positive material expanding the mesangium with lobular formation and limited increase in mesangial cellularity, also present along the glomerular basement membranes; vacuolated renal tubular epithelial cells with no pathological interstitium.
On Masson’s trichrome staining, fibronectin glomerulopathy shows reddish-violet
Figure 3. On Masson’s trichrome staining, fibronectin glomerulopathy shows reddish-violet amorphous mesangial and subendothelial deposits that do not stain blue like collagen, highlighting the non-collagenous nature of the accumulated material.
Periodic acid silver methenamine staining reveals thickening of the basement membrane
Figure 4. Periodic acid silver methenamine staining reveals thickening of the basement membrane with silver methenamine stain-negative and PAS-positive areas in the mesangium space (×200).
Electron microscopy: mesangial and subendothelial deposits (mostly granular) with focal fibrillary substructure.
Figure 5. Electron microscopy: mesangial and subendothelial deposits (mostly granular) with focal fibrillary substructure.

 

Discussion

In this report, we present a case of FNG with a pathological diagnosis of Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis (MPGN). The diagnosis was confirmed by Electron Microscopy (EM) and genetic analysis – patient’s parents did not have a history of kidney disease – with later genetic diagnosis confirmed also in the patient’s brother as well.

FNG is caused by mutations in the fibronectin 1 gene (FN1) on chromosome 2 [3] and is featured by massive deposition of mutant fibronectin in the mesangium and along capillary walls [2, 4, 5].

Molecular Background

Fibronectin (FN) is a high-molecular-weight glycoprotein component of the extracellular matrix. It is normally produced by the liver and renal mesangial cells [2]. FN is present in plasma as a soluble form (pFN) or deposited in extracellular matrix as insoluble organized fibrils (cellular FN) [6]. The Hep-II and -III domains play a main role in regulating FN assembly into organized fibrils in extracellular matrix, through complex FN–FN and FN–cell surface proteoglycan interactions [710].

The pathogenic mechanism of fibronectin accumulation is not completely understood but may involve the production of a fibronectin variant that cannot be cleared, or the formation of a variant fibronectin formed by attachment of a circulating factor. The deposits consist predominantly of the soluble plasma-derived form of fibronectin, rather than the insoluble cellular form. Another proposed mechanism is a defect in the catabolism of fibronectin [2].

Fibronectin 1 (FN1) gene mutation is usually detected in about 40% of patients in Castelletti study group [3] and is believed to be responsible for the occurrence of the disease. However, no specific treatment is currently available. [3, 11, 12]. The W1925R variant identified in the present case was reported in literature to cause glomerulopathy with fibronectin deposits [3]: in this study W1925R variant was identified in all affected by FG and was not found in any of 100 healthy subjects [3].

They sequenced the FN1 in 15 unrelated pedigrees and found three heterozygous missense mutations, the W1925R, L1974R, and Y973C, that cosegregated with this glomerulopathy [3].

Mutations in the FN1 gene have been implicated in a variety of collagen-related diseases due to fibronectin’s essential role in the extracellular matrix and its interactions with collagen. Studies have shown that alterations in FN1 have been linked to early-onset osteoarthritis, where impaired interactions between fibronectin and collagen type II affect cartilage integrity [13]. Furthermore, skeletal dysplasias have been associated with FN1 mutations, as fibronectin is critical for the correct formation of collagen fibers in bones [14]. In the context of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, a connective tissue disorder primarily caused by defects in collagen, FN1 mutations may exacerbate collagen dysfunction, further destabilizing the extracellular matrix and contributing to the clinical manifestations of the disease [15].

Our W1925R mutation introduces a basic amino acid in the Hep-II hydrophobic core; this mutation could theoretically increase the Hep-II affinity for heparin, by providing additional cationic charge to the domain; however, it could also alter the folding of the domain and impair its function. So they suggest that GFND-associated mutations in FN1 impair the control of the assembly of FN into fibrils and the balance between soluble and insoluble FN, which could explain the abnormal incorporation of nonfibrillary pFN in the glomerular matrix that has been documented in renal biopsy [3].

Pathophysiology

Usually, the biopsy shows by light microscopy lobular accentuation with mesangial expansion with minimal hypercellularity and variable expansion of glomerular basement membranes by strongly periodic acid-Schiff-positive and silver-negative material. Congo red stain is negative. There are nonspecific tubulointerstitial and vascular changes with increased fibrosis with progression of disease. Immunofluorescence/immunohistochemistry microscopy is usually negative, but may show nonspecific staining for immunoglobulins and C3 [2]. Electron microscopically, fibronectin deposition is shown as finely granular or fibrillary substructures with randomly arranged 12–16-nm fibrils [2, 4, 5] and we could testify it with the help of electron microscope.

Clinical Management

Ti Zhang et al. Reported a case series of 19 patients with FNG diagnosis that were treated with renin-angiotensin system blockade, including 11 patients who were treated with Tripterygium Wilfordii Hook (TWHF), and 4 patients with corticosteroid therapy in combination with immunosuppressive therapies, including 2 with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and 2 with tacrolimus. The mean follow-up duration was 78 months (range 14–147 months, median 87). At last follow-up, 7 patients progressed to ESRD despite supportive therapy and required initiation of dialysis, 2 of whom received renal transplantation [16]. In most of cases reported in literature, corticosteroid therapy doesn’t help to reduce or prevent kidney disease progression [17, 18]. Steroid therapy has been tested, but its effectiveness is controversial. Prednisolone treatment decreased proteinuria in some patients with nephrotic-level proteinuria [19] but did not yield a clear treatment response in other patients [17, 18] and is commonly attempted in cases with a histological diagnosis of MPGN [20].

Currently angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and ARBs are generally used for renal protection. The initiation of steroid therapy for FNG should be carefully considered on an individual basis [17].

 

Conclusion

We encountered a case of FNG in a 22-year-old female patient presenting with sub-nephrotic range proteinuria, supported by both histological features of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis on kidney biopsy and subsequently confirmed by genetic testing. Following the patient’s diagnosis, genetic screening was also extended to first-degree relatives (brother), with a positive result for the disease.

We therefore decided to use a conservative therapy, because of the steroids side effects and the absence of nephrotic syndrome in our patient, with a normal kidney function.

After three years kidney function remained stable and proteinuria reduced to 0.7 g/die.

 

Bibliography

  1. Gemperle O, Neuweiler J, Reutter FW, Hildebrandt F, Krapf R. Familial glomerulopathy with giant fibrillar (fibronectin-positive) deposits: 15-year follow-up in a large kindred. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996;28(5):668–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90247-4
  2. Lusco MA, Chen YP, Cheng H, et al. AJKD atlas of renal pathology: fibronectin glomerulopathy. Am J Kidney Dis. (2017) 70:e21–2. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.09.001
  3. Castelletti F, Donadelli R, Banterla F, et al. Mutations in FN1 cause glomerulopathy with fibronectin deposits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2008) 105:2538–43. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707730105
  4. Strøm EH, Banfi G, Krapf R, Abt AB, et al. Glomerulopathy associated with predominant fibronectin deposits: a newly recognized hereditary disease. Kidney Int. (1995) 48:163–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1995.280
  5. Ohashi T, Erickson HP. Fibronectin aggregation and assembly: the unfolding of the second fibronectin type III domain. J Biol Chem. (2011) 286:39188–99. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.262337
  6. Yamada KM, Kennedy DW (1979) Fibroblast cellular and plasma fibronectins are similar but not identical. J Cell Biol 80:492–498. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.80.2.492
  7. Santas AJ, Peterson JA, Halbleib JL, et al. Alternative splicing of the IIICS domain in fibronectin governs the role of the heparin II domain in fibrillogenesis and cell spreading. J Biol Chem (2002) 277:13650–13658. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m111361200
  8. Bultmann H, Santas AJ, Peters DM. Fibronectin fibrillogenesis involves the heparin II binding domain of fibronectin. J Biol Chem. 1998. 273:2601–2609. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.5.2601
  9. Maqueda A, Moyano JV, Hernandez Del Cerro M, et al. The heparin III-binding domain of fibronectin (III4-5 repeats) binds to fibronectin and inhibits fibronectin matrix assembly (2007) Matrix Biol 126:642–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2007.06.001
  10. Mao Y, Schwarzbauer B. Fibronectin fibrillogenesis, a cell-mediated matrix assembly process. (2005) Matrix Biol 25:389–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2005.06.008
  11. Ohtsubo H, Okada T, Nozu K, et al. Identification of mutations in FN1 leading to glomerulopathy with fibronectin deposits. Pediatr Nephrol. (2016) 31:1459–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3368-7
  12. Aslam N, Singh A, Cortese C, Riegert-Johnson DL. A novel variant in FN1 in a family with fibronectin glomerulopathy. Hum Genome Var. (2019) 6:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41439-019-0042-1
  13. van Hoolwerff M, Rodríguez Ruiz A. et al. High-impact FN1 mutation decreases chondrogenic potential and affects cartilage deposition via decreased binding to collagen type II. Nature Genetics, 2021 Nov 5;7(45):eabg8583. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg8583
  14. Neha E.H. Dinesh, Philippe M. Campeau, Dieter P. Reinhardt. The integral role of fibronectin in skeletal morphogenesis and pathogenesis. Matrix Biology 134 (2024) 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2024.08.010
  15. Nicoletta Zoppi, Marco Ritelli, Marina Colombi. Type III and V collagens modulate the expression and assembly of EDA(+) fibronectin in the extracellular matrix of defective Ehlers-Danlos syndrome fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta (2012) 1820(10):1576-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.06.004
  16. Ti Zhang, Wei Zhang, Ke Zuo and Zhen Cheng. Clinicopathologic Features and Outcomes in Fibronectin Glomerulopathy: A Case Series of 19 Patients, Brief research report article Front. Med., 14 August 2020, Volume 7 – 20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00439
  17. Hata M, Mori T, Hirose Y, et al. A case of unexpected diagnosis of fibronectin glomerulopathy with histological features of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. BMC Nephrol. 2024;25(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03456-7
  18. Yoshino M, Miura N, Ohnishi T, et al. Clinicopathological analysis of glomerulopathy with fibronectin deposits (GFND): a case of sporadic, elderly-onset GFND with codeposition of IgA, C1q, and fibrinogen. Intern Med. 2013;52(15):1715–20. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.52.0046
  19. Goldman BI, Panner BJ, Welle SL, Gross MD, Gray DA. Prednisone-induced sustained remission in a patient with familial fibronectin glomerulopathy (GFND). CEN Case Rep. 2021;10(4):510–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13730-021-00595-w
  20. Noris M, Remuzzi G. Translational mini-review series on complement factor H: therapies of renal diseases associated with complement factor H abnormalities: atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;151(2):199–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03558.x

Terapia conservativa massimale o dialisi nei pazienti nefropatici fragili? Risultati di uno studio retrospettivo di confronto

Abstract

Background e obiettivi: Esiste crescente evidenza scientifica che la dialisi cronica nei pazienti nefropatici fragili può peggiorare il carico dei sintomi e l’autonomia funzionale, aumentando il rischio di mortalità precoce. Per questi pazienti è legittimo chiedersi se il trattamento dialitico rappresenti un reale vantaggio o se piuttosto non sia più adeguata una Terapia Conservativa Massimale (TCM), da associare alle cure palliative, con l’obiettivo di migliorarne la qualità di vita residua evitando il ricorso alla dialisi. L’obiettivo di questo lavoro è quello di descrivere l’applicazione e i relativi esiti del percorso di TCM in una serie completa di casi seguiti nel nostro ambulatorio nefrologico.

Disegno e setting dello studio: Si tratta di uno studio osservazionale retrospettivo su una coorte di 48 pazienti nefropatici fragili in TCM e 58 in dialisi, nel periodo compreso tra gennaio 2013 e dicembre 2019. Sono stati studiati luogo di morte, Incidence Rate (IR) e Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) relativi alla sopravvivenza e ai tassi di ospedalizzazione.

Risultati: La durata media della TCM è stata di circa 9,7 mesi vs 13,5 mesi del trattamento dialitico. I pazienti in dialisi hanno una probabilità di sopravvivenza a un anno di 0,52 [CI 0,38-0,64] vs 0,48 [CI 0,33-0,62] nei pazienti in TCM, a fronte tuttavia di un maggior numero di ospedalizzazioni (IR 2,780 vs 1,269 nei pazienti in TCM), IRR 2,19 [CI 1,66-2,89], dato conforme a quanto descritto in letteratura.

Il 67% dei pazienti dializzati è deceduto in ospedale contro il 35% dei pazienti in TCM. Il 34% dei pazienti in TCM risulta ancora in vita al momento dell’analisi dei dati (31/01/2020); nessun paziente in dialisi è ancora in vita alla stessa data.

Conclusioni: Il ricorso al trattamento dialitico ha mostrato un effetto marginale, ancorché significativo, sulla sopravvivenza media dei pazienti nefropatici fragili, a spese però di un aumento anch’esso significativo del numero di ospedalizzazioni con conseguente impatto sulla qualità di vita. La scelta del percorso (TCM vs dialisi) non dovrebbe dunque essere condizionata solo dal numero delle comorbidità, ma soprattutto dalla tipologia di queste ultime, rappresentando di volta in volta un elemento sul piatto della bilancia a favore della scelta conservativa o dialitica.

Parole chiave: terapia conservativa, dialisi, sopravvivenza, fragilità

Introduzione

La Malattia Renale Cronica (MRC) è il destino comune di molte nefropatie che possono evolvere fino alla necessità del trattamento sostitutivo dialitico o del trapianto renale. Si tratta quindi di un significativo problema di salute pubblica non solo in quanto causa di morbidità nella popolazione generale, ma anche e soprattutto perché rappresenta un fattore di rischio indipendente per la compromissione, il declino funzionale e la fragilità associandosi ad outcomes negativi come eccesso di mortalità e ospedalizzazione [1].