Covid-19 e mortalità dei pazienti in emodialisi cronica: causa o semplice concomitanza? L’esperienza del Policlinico Gemelli

Abstract

Background. Questo studio ha valutato le cause e i fattori di rischio di mortalità tra i pazienti in emodialisi (HD) cronica ricoverati con SARS-CoV-2; in particolare, ha valutato se la causa di morte fosse direttamente correlata alla malattia da coronavirus 2019 (Covid-19) o a un’altra patologia. Il registro della European Renal Association ha mostrato un tasso di mortalità del 20% dopo 28 giorni per questi pazienti.
Metodi. Sono stati analizzati i dati clinici dei pazienti in HD cronica ricoverati a causa dell’infezione da SARS-CoV-2 presso la Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli dal 15 marzo 2020 al 28 febbraio 2022. Sono state eseguite analisi di regressione univariata e multivariata per identificare i fattori di rischio di mortalità. Le cause di mortalità sono state ricavate dalle Schede di Dimissione Ospedaliera.
Risultati. 152 pazienti in emodialisi di mantenimento con risultati positivi al test per SARS-CoV-2 sono stati ricoverati durante il periodo di studio. I pazienti erano 100 maschi (65,8%) e 52 femmine (34,2%) (età media, 69 anni; deviazione standard [SD], 14,14 anni). Il Charlson Comorbidity Index medio (CCI) era di 6,44 (SD, 2,64) e la durata media del ricovero era di 23,57 giorni (SD, 24,55 giorni). 42 (27,6%) pazienti sono deceduti, ma solo 22 decessi (59%) sono stati causati direttamente dal Covid-19.
Conclusioni. Solo il 59% dei decessi dei pazienti con risultati positivi al test per Covid-19 è stato causato direttamente dal Covid-19. La sopravvivenza dei pazienti in HD cronica è correlata in modo indipendente a specifiche caratteristiche del paziente (età, CCI, presenza di malattia vascolare periferica e ricovero in unità di terapia intensiva), ma non al Covid-19.

Parole chiave: Covid-19, emodialisi, mortalità, Sars-CoV-2

Ci spiace, ma questo articolo è disponibile soltanto in inglese.

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), which caused a global pandemic of unprecedented proportions, is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and characterised by severe acute respiratory syndrome. Since the onset of the pandemic in Wuhan, China, SARS-CoV-2 has infected more than 28 million individuals worldwide and killed more than 6 million individuals. It is mainly characterised by moderate-to-severe pneumonia associated with progressive endothelial damage and coagulopathy, but it can also involve other organs, including the kidneys. Evidence has suggested a higher incidence of severe SARS-CoV-2 among individuals with chronic conditions, including chronic kidney failure [1], and an association with acute kidney damage caused by direct effects on tubular cells and podocytes and the production of cytokines and hypoxemic tubular damage [2, 3].

Recent data have shown that patients with chronic kidney disease experience worse outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection that are related to multi-organ involvement, thrombotic events, and accentuation of the inflammatory response [46].

The average age of patients undergoing chronic dialysis treatment is 65 years, and they present with multiple comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, obesity, and uraemia-induced immune alterations. All these factors significantly increase the risk of negative outcomes if patients are infected with SARS-CoV-2 [79]. Furthermore, they are at increased risk for hospitalisation in intensive care units and mortality rates more than 25% [10].

No studies have differentiated between the causes of mortality among patients on maintenance haemodialysis with positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab test results; in particular, mortality can be distinguished as that attributable to either Covid-19 disease or other causes. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the causes of and risk factors for mortality among patients on chronic HD who are hospitalised with positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab test results and investigate whether the cause of death was directly attributable to Covid-19 or other pathologies.

 

Materials and methods

The clinical data of patients on chronic haemodialysis treatment hospitalised because of SARS-CoV-2 infection at the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli from 15 March 2020 to 28 February 2022 were analysed. Our data refer to the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 infection (wild-type virus) and the delta and omicron variants.

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli on 21 April 2022 (prot. 001452/22). We analysed patient data from the electronic databases of medical records and hospital discharge records to determine the cause of mortality. Personal data, laboratory test results, types and modalities of renal replacement treatment, active comorbidities (type 2 diabetes mellitus, vascular disease, heart disease, tumours), and vaccination status of each patient were collected. Additionally, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) adjusted for age was calculated.

In Italy, in-hospital death attributable to Covid-19 has been identified with specific codes since the publication of Gazzetta Ufficiale on 28 October 2020 [11].

These codes are national hospital coding mandatorily reported upon patient discharge and used by national health system to identify causes of death for each patient. Furthermore, they are used for national statistics and reports.

The following mortality data codes were recorded in the hospital discharge forms of patients whose deaths were caused by Covid-19: Covid-19 pneumonia (480.41), Covid-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome, and Covid-19 respiratory failure (518.91).

All patients with Covid-19 were treated with bicarbonate haemodialysis and a Theranova 400 Baxter® filter. Bedside treatments were performed in the patient’s room using the Genius® Fresenius system. Each treatment lasted 180 to 210 min to reduce the exposure time to Covid-19 among healthcare personnel.

During our study, we considered all patients who received at least one dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to be vaccinated. Complementary mRNA (BNT162b2) was the first vaccine approved in Europe by the European Medicines Agency in December 2020. However, it has been available in Italy for long-term haemodialysis patients since February 2021.

Because all our patients were infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, we included patients in the vaccinated group if they were administered one dose of the vaccine.

 

Statistical analysis

Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of mortality risk factors, such as mean age, sex, number of haemodialysis sessions, hospitalisation (days), CCI, comorbidities (type 2 diabetes mellitus, vascular disease, heart disease, tumours), and diagnosis at the time of hospitalisation (Covid-19 pneumonia, asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, paucisymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, Covid-19 respiratory failure, and radiological diagnosis of Covid-19 pneumonia) were performed.

The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate. Numerical data were expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed variables; they were expressed as the median and interquartile range (IQR) for non-normally distributed data. The normality of the numerical variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Categorical data are presented as numbers and percentages.

The differences between the numerical variables were assessed using Student’s t test (for normally distributed data) or the Mann-Whitney U test (for non-normally distributed data), as appropriate. Differences between qualitative variables were determined using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

Logistic and multivariate regression analyses were performed to analyse the predictors of in-hospital mortality. The multivariate analysis was adjusted for factors significantly associated with the univariate analysis (p < 0.05) or trend (p < 0.1). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

 

Results

152 patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results were hospitalised during the study period. The demographic characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1.

There were 100 male (65.8%) and 52 female (34.2%) patients with a mean age of 69 years (SD, 14.14). The mean CCI was 6.44 (SD, 2.64). The average hospitalisation length was 23.57 days (SD, 24.55 days). 52 (34.2%) patients had diabetes, 54 (35.5%) had vasculopathy, 64 (42.1%) had cardiopathy, 30 (19.7%) had neoplasms, 16 (10.5%) required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). 42 (27.6%) patients died. Among these patients, based on the administrative coding, the main causes of death were SARS-CoV-2 infection for 22 (59%) patients and other pathologies for 20 (41%) patients (Table 2).

For all patients, ICU admission, dyspnoea, ICU admission, vasculopathy, cardiopathy, neoplasm, CCI, vaccination status, and radiological diagnosis of pneumonia were significant according to the chi-square test (p < 0.01).

According to Student’s t test, older patients and those with lower albumin levels were at higher risk for death. For those in the deceased patient group, the median age was 64.43 years (SD, 14.62 years) and the median albumin level was 25.19 (SD, 5.02) g/L.

According to the Mann–Whitney U test, the following variables had statistical significance: HD frequency (median, 5.50; IQR, 2.00-10.00; p < 0.001); CCI (median, 6.00; IQR, 5.00-8.00; p < 0.001); ICU length of stay (median, 0.00; IQR, 0.00-0.00; p < 0.001); white blood cell count (median, 7.02; IQR, 4.90-9.51; p < 0.001); C-reactive protein (median, 50.30; IQR, 15.05-141.45; p < 0.001); NT-proBNP (median, 16480.00; IQR, 3917.50-45738.25; p < 0.05); D-dimer (median, 1801.00; IQR, 952.75-3514.00; p < 0.05); activated partial thromboplastin time (median, 37.80; IQR, 34.38-43.40; p < 0.05); and IL-6 (median, 24.06; IQR, 10.73-55.33; p < 0.05).

For patients with SARS-CoV-2 who died, 74 (48.7%) had fever and 65 (42.8%) had dyspnoea; furthermore, 74 (48.7%) had a radiological diagnosis of pneumonia (Table 3).

We analysed the causes of death unrelated to SARS-CoV-2. Most of deaths were caused by severe sepsis (31.6%), followed by respiratory failure (23.5%) and pneumonia attributable to other pathogens (15.7%).

We divided the hospitalisations into two periods. The first period was approximately 11 months (March 2020 to February 2021) and characterised by infections attributable to the wild-type virus and the absence of vaccines. The second period was approximately 19 months (March 2021 to October 2022) and characterised by infections related to the delta and omicron variants and the availability of vaccines. Vaccination, even a single dose, conferred protection against mortality (Figure 1).

Patients (152)
Middle age (mean ± SD) 69 ± 14.14
M/F 100/52
N° HD 1007
N° HD average/patients (mean ± SD) 7.66 ± 6.54
N° Hospitalized ward 152
N° Hospitalized Intensive Care Unite 18
Average days of hospitalization (mean ± SD) 23.57 ± 24.55
Charlson Comorbidity Index (mean ± SD) 6.44 ± 2.64
COMORBIDITY N (%)
Diabetes Mellitus 52 (34.2%)
Vasculophaty 53 (34.9%)
Cardiophaty 64 (42.1%)
Cancer 30 (19.7%)
ADMISSION DIAGNOSIS N (%)
COVID-19 pneumonia 59 (38.8%)
Symptomatic SARS-CoV2 infection 53 (34.9%)
Asymptomatic SARS-CoV2 infection 8 (5.3%)
SARS-CoV2 respiratory failure 3 (2%)
Radiological diagnosis of pneumonia 74 (48.7%)
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.
Causes of death N (%)
Respiratory failure by other causes 4 (23.5%)
Pneumonia by other pathogens 3 (15.7%)
GI perforation 1 (5.3%)
Severe sepsis 6 (31.6%)
Heart attack 1 (5.3%)
Thromboembolism 1 (5.3%)
Acute vascular failure 1 (5.3%)
Total deaths 17 (100%)
Table 2. Causes of death other than COVID-19.  Most deaths that were not related to COVID-19 were related to sepsis by other pathogens. GI, gastrointestinal.
Variable Median [IQR8] p value
HD1 frequency 5.50 [2.00-10.00] <0.001*
CCI2 6.00 [5.00-8-00] <0.001*
Length of stay (ICU3) 0.00 [0.00-0.00] <0.001*
WBC4 7.02 [4.90-9.51] <0.001*
CRP5 50.30 [15.05-141.45] <0.001*
NT-proBNP 16480.00 [3917.50-45738.25] 0.037*
LDH6 227.00 [183.00-319.00] <0.001*
D-dimer 1801.00 [952.75-3514.00] <0.001*
aPTT7 37.80 [34.38-43.40] 0.049*
IL-6 24.06 [10.73-55.33] 0.022*
Table 3. Multivariate regression analysis of the mortality risk and variables with statistical significance according to the Mann-Whitney U test.
1HD, haemodialysis; 2CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; 3ICU, intensive care unit; 4WBC, white blood cell; 5CRP, C-reactive protein; 6LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; 7aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; 8IQR, interquartile range.
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of patients who received and did not receive the Covid-19 vaccine.
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of patients who received and did not receive the Covid-19 vaccine.

 

Discussion

To our knowledge, no studies have investigated whether the cause of death is directly attributable to the virus or other causes among patients on maintenance haemodialysis with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results.

Our study tried to distinguish between deaths caused by Covid-19 and deaths that occurred with Covid-19. Our data showed that of the total number of deaths of patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, 59% were directly caused by infection and 41% were attributable to other causes. Age, ICU admission, dyspnoea, ICU stay, vasculopathy, cardiopathy, neoplasm, vaccination status, and radiological diagnosis of pneumonia were risk factors for mortality. According to the European Renal Association registry, our study showed that the intrahospital all-cause mortality rate for patients with positive nasopharyngeal swab results was 21.9%; however, only 11.9% of these deaths were directly caused by Covid-19.

The mortality risk factors in our study were the same as those for the general population on dialysis, such as the coexistence of cardiovascular disease, advanced age, ICU admission, and CCI [12, 13].

Several studies have demonstrated that multiple markers and factors influence the risk of cardiac mortality and mortality for patients undergoing haemodialysis. Age, sex, diabetes mellitus, previous cardiovascular disease, and HD duration markedly increased the risk of mortality for these patients.

According to a study by Jager et al. [14], risk factors associated with Covid-19 mortality among patients on dialysis are age 75 years or older, male sex, and black race; furthermore, hypertension and cardiovascular disease were the most common comorbidities, followed by diabetes mellitus, previous kidney transplantation, and glomerular disease.

During the present study, vaccination was confirmed to be a protective factor. Only one dose effectively reduced the hospitalisation and mortality rates. The number of hospitalisations during different periods (wild-type virus and delta and omicron variants) remained constant despite the higher overall number of infected patients in the population with variants of the virus. This was attributable to the mass vaccination of the Italian population, with those at the highest risk being vaccinated first.

In Italy, of the 2,974,536 individuals infected during the first studied period, 101,346 died; furthermore, of the 20,850,660 individuals infected during the second studied period, 78,611 died [15].

The reported incidence of Covid-19 among individuals with chronic kidney disease is 66 per 10,000 affected individuals per week (estimated from 88 studies of 14,972 patients with chronic kidney disease and Covid-19 infection and 740,452 participants with Covid-19 and kidney disease), which is higher than the global incidence of 5 per 10,000 affected individuals per week.

Chronic kidney disease is a risk factor for developing a severe form of Covid-19, increased risk of mortality, and increased need for hospitalization [16, 17]. Furthermore, these risks increase as kidney disease worsens, reaching their maximum in patients on haemodialysis [18].

Patients undergoing haemodialysis are generally frail, immunodeficient, and at greater risk for infectious diseases. Additionally, the incidence of infection was higher among patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing renal replacement treatment, and it was related to worsening renal function [19].

During the pandemic, the prevalence of Covid-19 among dialysis patients was 0% to 37.6%. Furthermore, during the first outbreak of Covid-19, the mortality rate associated with SARS-CoV-2 was higher than that of most other viral infections. However, a death rate of 2.3% was reported in China, and the average death rate in Europe was 11.7% (range, 0.6%–18.9%). Among patients hospitalised for severe forms of Covid-19 in the United Kingdom, the mortality rate reached 26% [20, 21]. Mortality rates of patients with chronic kidney disease and Covid-19 were also higher than those of patients with chronic kidney disease without SARS-CoV-2 and those of the general population, as demonstrated by different studies conducted in China, Italy, the United States (New York and southern California), and the United Kingdom [2228].

Our study results suggest that vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 for patients undergoing chronic haemodialysis is effective for preventing complications associated with SARS-CoV-2. As reported by Miao et al. [29], the incidences of death (11.1% vs. 3.8%) and hospitalisation (55.6% vs. 23.5%) were higher for unvaccinated patients than for vaccinated patients. These results were strengthened by the significantly greater incidence of hospitalisation among partially vaccinated patients (63.6% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.004) and patients who did not receive booster vaccines (32% vs. 16.4%; p = 0.04) compared to that among patients who were fully vaccinated and received booster vaccines. Moreover, the composite risk of death or hospitalisation was lower among vaccinated patients after adjusting for age, sex, and CCI (odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.40). However, according to other studies, patients who received a single dose of the vaccine experienced good results. Bernal et al. [30] reported that patients who received one dose of ChAdOx1-S had a 37% (3%-59%) reduced risk of emergency hospital admission. A single dose of either vaccine was 80% effective for preventing hospitalisation attributable to Covid-19, and a single dose of BNT162b2 was 85% effective for preventing death caused by Covid-19.

During the pandemic, the most complex challenges included the management and organisation of dialysis centres. Patients undergoing renal replacement treatment are more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2; often, it is not possible to maintain physical distance because of the need to perform treatment in an overcrowded environment. Additionally, these patients frequently rely on social support and caregivers for assistance, daily activities, and medication management, resulting in possible opportunities for infection. Therefore, it is essential to ensure the constant support and monitoring of these patients through continuous screening, vaccination, and rapid hospitalisation when their nasopharyngeal molecular swab test results are positive.

However, despite attempts at good resource management in dialysis centres, the incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 among patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing renal replacement treatment is significantly higher than that among patients with chronic disease receiving conservative treatment. This hypothesis is supported by the results of a study conducted in Italy and the United States [19] that found that the incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 was similar for patients undergoing home haemodialysis and the general population (6 affected individuals per week vs. 2-6 affected individuals per week). We based our analysis on hospital discharge forms and the presence or absence of patients who died of causes other than SARS-CoV-2.

However, the long-term consequences of Covid-19 for patients undergoing dialysis remain poorly understood. Long Covid, which comprises the persistence of symptoms or the appearance of a new infection after 4 weeks, has been observed in both mildly and severely infected patients. The plethora of associated symptoms include fatigue, dyspnoea, heart involvement, muscle aches, headaches, joint pain, and neuropsychological disorders; however, because the majority of patients administered haemodialysis replacement treatment commonly present with these symptoms, it is difficult to assess the true correlation with long Covid [31].

Overall, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has brought the scientific community’s focus back to the importance of chronic renal failure as a systemic and non-district disease, associated with an increased risk of death from all causes.

 

Limitations

Our study is one of the few to investigate the primary cause of death of patients with positive nasopharyngeal swab test results during the haemodialysis regimen. However, this study had some limitations. First, it was a monocentric retrospective study. Consequently, it had a small sample size, but errors could be reduced because of methodological approaches. Furthermore, the population analysed was highly heterogeneous and difficult to standardise because of the heterogeneity of clinical presentations. Because of the small size of the study population, we were unable to statistically identify any differences in mortality risk factors of the group who died as a result of Covid-19 and those who died as a result of other causes with positive Covid-19 nasopharyngeal swab test results.

Another limitation could be the dialysis methodology. We analysed only bicarbonate haemodialysis, and there is some evidence that other methodologies associated with a convective flux such as hemodiafiltration or the adsorption properties of many dialysers can improve cytokine depuration implicated in the pathogenesis of Covid-19. However, there is no evidence that this technique improves disease outcomes. Furthermore, we utilised a particular type of dialyser, Theranova (manufactured by Baxter), which is a medium cutoff filter that is used in the HD mode and can generate an internal convective flux because of a very high amount of back-filtration that generates a high-pressure gradient. The combination of a moderately high internal convection volume and a higher sieving coefficient yielded better performance clearing middle molecules compared with standard HD.

 

Conclusions

Our study highlighted a mortality rate of 21.9% for patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal molecular swab test results, which was in line with the current data available in the literature. Of the total number of deaths of patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, 59% were caused by the infection and 41% were attributable to other causes. The mortality risk factors were almost the same as those of the general dialysis population, such as the coexistence of cardiovascular disease, advanced age, and the need for ICU admission. Age, CCI, presence of peripheral vascular disease, and the need for ICU admission were independent risk factors for mortality. Vaccination has been confirmed to be a protective factor. Special care is necessary to prevent Covid-19 in patients on dialysis, hospitalisation, severe disease courses, and poor outcomes.

 

Bibliography

  1. Guan W-J, Ni Z-Y, Hu Y et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. The New England Journal of Medicine 2020; 382: 1708–1720. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2002032.
  2. Su H, Yang M, Wan C et al. Renal histopathological analysis of 26 postmortem findings of patients with COVID-19 in China. Kidney International 2020; 98: 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.04.003.
  3. Naicker S, Yang C-W, Hwang S-J et al. The Novel Coronavirus 2019 epidemic and kidneys. Kidney International 2020; 97: 824–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.001.
  4. Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature 2020; 584: 430–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4.
  5. Henry BM, Lippi G. Chronic kidney disease is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. International Urology and Nephrology 2020; 52: 1193–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02451-9.
  6. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England) 2020; 395: 1763–1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31189-2.
  7. Gupta S, Hayek SS, Wang W et al. Factors Associated with Death in Critically Ill Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US. JAMA internal medicine 2020; 180: 1436–1447. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3596.
  8. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M et al. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA 2020; 323: 2052–2059. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6775.
  9. Petrilli CM, Jones SA, Yang J et al. Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2020; 369: m1966. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1966.
  10. Hsu CM, Weiner DE, Aweh G et al. COVID-19 Among US Dialysis Patients: Risk Factors and Outcomes From a National Dialysis Provider. American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation 2021; 77: 748-756.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.01.003.
  11. GU 2020, L 269, https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/gazzetta/serie_generale/caricaDettaglio?dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=2020-10-28&numeroGazzetta=269
  12. Alfano G, Ferrari A, Magistroni R et al. The frail world of haemodialysis patients in the COVID-19 pandemic era: a systematic scoping review. Journal of Nephrology 2021; 34: 1387–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-021-01136-5.
  13. Quintaliani G, Reboldi G, Di Napoli A et al. Exposure to novel coronavirus in patients on renal replacement therapy during the exponential phase of COVID-19 pandemic: survey of the Italian Society of Nephrology. Journal of Nephrology 2020; 33: 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-020-00794-1.
  14. Jager KJ, Kramer A, Chesnaye NC et al. Results from the ERA-EDTA Registry indicate a high mortality due to COVID-19 in dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients across Europe. Kidney International 2020; 98: 1540–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.09.006.
  15. EpiCentro. Tutto sulla pandemia di SARS-CoV-2 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 24] Available from: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus/sars-cov-2.
  16. Williamson, E.J., Walker, A.J., Bhaskaran, K. et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature 584, 430–436 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4.
  17. Marmor HN, Pike M, Zhao Z (, Ye F, Deppen SA (2022) Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 related mortality and hospitalization before vaccination: A meta-analysis. PLOS Glob Public Health 2(11): e0001187. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001187.
  18. Eric Goffin, Alexandre Candellier, Priya Vart, Marlies Noordzij, Miha Arnol, Adrian Covic, Paolo Lentini, Shafi Malik, Louis J Reichert, Mehmet S Sever, Bruno Watschinger, Kitty J Jager, Ron T Gansevoort, ERACODA Collaborators , COVID-19-related mortality in kidney transplant and haemodialysis patients: a comparative, prospective registry-based study, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Volume 36, Issue 11, November 2021, Pages 2094–2105. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfab200.
  19. Chung EYM, Palmer SC, Natale P et al. Incidence and Outcomes of COVID-19 in People With CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation 2021; 78: 804–815. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.07.003.
  20. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020; 323: 1239–1242. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2648.
  21. Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Green CA et al. Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2020; 369: m1985. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1985.
  22. Xiong F, Tang H, Liu L et al. Clinical Characteristics of and Medical Interventions for COVID-19 in Hemodialysis Patients in Wuhan, China. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN 2020; 31: 1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020030354.
  23. Alberici F, Delbarba E, Manenti C et al. A report from the Brescia Renal COVID Task Force on the clinical characteristics and short-term outcome of hemodialysis patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Kidney International 2020; 98: 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.04.030.
  24. Tang H, Tian J-B, Dong J-W et al. Serologic Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Hemodialysis Centers: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Wuhan, China. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2020; 76: 490-499.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.06.008.
  25. Corbett RW, Blakey S, Nitsch D et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 in an Urban Dialysis Center. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN 2020; 31: 1815–1823. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020040534.
  26. Weiss S, Bhat P, Del Pilar Fernandez M et al. COVID-19 Infection in ESKD: Findings from a Prospective Disease Surveillance Program at Dialysis Facilities in New York City and Long Island. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN 2020; 31: 2517–2521. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020070932.
  27. Valeri AM, Robbins-Juarez SY, Stevens JS et al. Presentation and Outcomes of Patients with ESKD and COVID-19. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN 2020; 31: 1409–1415. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020040470.
  28. Sim JJ, Huang C-W, Selevan DC et al. COVID-19 and Survival in Maintenance Dialysis. Kidney Medicine 2021; 3: 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2020.11.005.
  29. Miao J, Olson E, Houlihan S et al. Effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on the severity of COVID-19 infection in patients on chronic dialysis. Journal of Nephrology 2023; 36: 1321–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-023-01617-9.
  30. Lopez Bernal J, Andrews N, Gower C et al. Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2021; 373: n1088. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1088.
  31. Crook H, Raza S, Nowell J et al. Long covid-mechanisms, risk factors, and management. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2021; 374: n1648. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1648.

Revisione narrativa sulla fistola artero-venosa per emodialisi

Abstract

La FAV rappresenta la “lifeline” per il paziente in dialisi; pertanto, sono essenziali un suo continuo monitoraggio e sorveglianza.

Per quanto i dati epidemiologici abbiano indicato un incremento nel corso degli anni dell’età anagrafica nonché del numero dei pazienti con diabete e/o arteriosclerosi, la FAV resta tuttora l’accesso vascolare più comune rispetto al catetere venoso centrale ed alla protesi vascolare. La FAV presenta un minor rischio di infezione ed ospedalizzazione, garantisce una maggiore efficienza dialitica e conseguente prolungata sopravvivenza del paziente.

Da quando i medici Cimino e Brescia concepirono la fistola artero-venosa (FAV) per la dialisi cronica, le linee-guida che si sono succedute hanno fornito suggerimenti sul tipo di anastomosi, collocazione (prossimale, distale), primo impiego della FAV, monitoraggio e sorveglianza del patrimonio vascolare del paziente.  È stato sottolineato il ruolo del paziente nell’autogestione della FAV e l’importanza di un team multidisciplinare nel monitorare e sorvegliare la FAV per ottenere prolungata longevità, maggiore efficienza dialitica e migliore sopravvivenza del paziente. La gestione richiede informazione ed istruzione del paziente, esame clinico da parte dello staff di dialisi e controlli periodici con esame ecodoppler per cogliere i primi segni di un malfunzionamento della FAV e procedere in tempo alla correzione.

La letteratura viene rivista e vengono riportati i suggerimenti delle linee guida ed i dati relativi al progetto Accesso Vascolare per Emodialisi (AVE); quest’ultimo è un progetto volto a valutare l’efficacia di un protocollo di monitoraggio e sorveglianza, operato da un team multidisciplinare, sull’efficienza dialitica, sulla longevità della FAV e sulla mortalità.

Parole chiave: fistola artero-venosa, dialisi extracorporea, mortalità, monitoraggio, sorveglianza

Introduzione

La fistola artero-venosa interna (FAV) fu concepita dai medici Cimino e Brescia nel 1966, quale superamento dello shunt artero-venoso esterno di Quinton-Scribner [1, 2].

La FAV resta l’accesso vascolare migliore ed è considerata la “lifeline” per il paziente in dialisi cronica essendo superiore agli altri accessi vascolari, quali catetere venoso centrale e protesi, rispetto ai quali presenta maggiore longevità, minor rischio di infezioni e formazione di trombi, ed assicura maggiore sopravvivenza al paziente [37].

Il trattamento dell’anemia del paziente con malattia renale cronica: dopo un viaggio lungo oltre 30 anni quali evidenze supportano la scelta motivata di un ESA?

Abstract

Gli Agenti Stimolanti l’Eritropoiesi (ESA) sono farmaci efficaci e ben tollerati per il trattamento dell’anemia nei pazienti con malattia renale cronica. Negli anni, la ricerca scientifica e la pratica clinica si sono focalizzati principalmente sul target di emoglobina da raggiungere, fino a valori nel range di normalità. Si è passati poi ad un approccio più cauto di correzione parziale dell’anemia.

Si è rivolta invece poca attenzione alle possibili differenze tra le diverse molecole di ESA. Nonostante presentino un comune meccanismo di azione sul recettore dell’eritropoietina, esse hanno peculiari caratteristiche farmacodinamiche che potrebbero dare segnali diversi di attivazione del recettore, con possibili differenze cliniche.

Alcuni studi e metanalisi, effettuati in passato, non hanno evidenziato differenze significative in tal senso tra i vari ESA. Più recentemente, uno studio osservazionale del registro di dialisi giapponese ha evidenziato un rischio di mortalità da ogni causa maggiore del 20% nei pazienti trattati con ESA a lunga emivita rispetto ai pazienti trattati con quelli a breve emivita; la differenza di rischio era più elevata nei pazienti che avevano ricevuto dosi più elevate di ESA. Tali risultati non sono stati confermati da un recente trial randomizzato che non ha dimostrato differenze significative nel rischio di morte da tutte le cause o di eventi cardiovascolari per la metossipolietilenglicole epoetina beta rispetto agli ESA a breve emivita o alla darbepoetina alfa. Infine, i dati di uno studio osservazionale italiano, effettuato in fase conservativa, hanno evidenziato un’associazione tra l’uso di alte dosi di ESA e un maggior rischio di CKD terminale, limitata al solo uso degli ESA a breve emivita.

In conclusione, la pari sicurezza degli ESA a lunga e a breve emivita è supportata da un trial randomizzato disegnato ad hoc per testare questa ipotesi. Gli studi osservazionali debbono essere considerati solo come generatori di ipotesi, per il rischio di bias prescrittivo.

Parole chiave: anemia, agenti stimolanti l’eritropoiesi, ESA, mortalità, malattia renale cronica, lunga emivita, breve emivita

Introduzione

Dalla pubblicazione dello storico lavoro di Eschbach più di 30 anni fa [1], il trattamento dell’anemia con i farmaci stimolanti l’eritropoiesi (Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents, ESAs) ha rivoluzionato la qualità della vita dei pazienti con malattia renale cronica (Chronic Kidney Disease, CKD). In quegli anni i pazienti erano gravemente anemici e spesso sopravvivevano con livelli di emoglobina anche inferiori a 5 g/dL, ricorrendo a periodiche trasfusioni, con alto rischio di trasmissione di un’epatite allora sconosciuta, definita “non A-non B” (oggi chiamata C) e con conseguente accumulo di grandi quantità di ferro. Nei casi più gravi i nefrologi erano costretti ad intervenire con un trattamento chelante a base di desferriossamina, a sua volta gravato da serie complicanze come la mucoviscidosi. Improvvisamente, grazie all’utilizzo dell’eritropoietina, i pazienti ricominciarono a vivere. Tale era l’entusiasmo dei nefrologi nel poter finalmente correggere efficacemente la grave anemia dei loro pazienti cronici, che si fecero trascinare fino a una correzione troppo rapida dei valori di emoglobina, portando a complicanze come un aumento dei valori pressori sino a severe crisi ipertensive e, a volte, convulsioni.

Associazione tra fratture vertebrali e calcificazioni vascolari

Abstract

Numerosi studi sia cross-sectional sia prospettici evidenziano una associazione tra fratture ossee e calcificazioni aortiche, specie se particolarmente severe, anche indipendentemente da potenziali fattori di confondimento, come invecchiamento, abitudine al fumo di sigaretta, ipertensione e diabete. Tale fenomeno interessa non solo la popolazione generale, ma anche i pazienti con malattia renale cronica, nei quali sono prevalenti le alterazioni strutturali dell’ osso corticale. A loro volta, le fratture ossee e le calcificazioni aortiche sono state associate ad aumentata morbilità e mortalità cardiovascolare, sia nella popolazione generale che nei pazienti con malattia renale cronica, in cui notoriamente è particolarmente elevato è il rischio cardiovascolare.

Pertanto, soprattutto nei pazienti con malattia renale cronica, la ricerca di fratture ossee e di calcificazioni aortiche potrebbe rappresentare un utile strumento per identificare i pazienti esposti ad un maggior rischio cardiovascolare ed ottimizzare la terapia della malattia metabolica ossea.

PAROLE CHIAVE: Fratture vertebrali, calcificazioni vascolari, malattia renale cronica, mortalità

INTRODUZIONE

L’Osteoporosi e le malattie cardiovascolari sono due importanti problemi di salute pubblica, entrambi associati ad elevata morbilità e ospedalizzazione di lunga durata, elevata mortalità ed elevato dispendio di risorse da parte del Sistema Sanitario (1).

Tra queste due patologie, inoltre, è documentata una stretta correlazione, sia nella popolazione generale, sia nei pazienti con malattia renale cronica (MRC), come dimostrato da recenti studi clinici sperimentali (234).

La relazione tra osso e vasi è molto ben riassunta, sotto l’aspetto biologico, dal processo di calcificazione della media dei vasi arteriosi. Infatti, alcuni modulatori chiave del metabolismo osseo e minerale sono coinvolti attivamente nel processo di calcificazione vascolare, in quanto esistono forti analogie tra le cellule della parete vascolare e il tessuto osseo. In particolare, le cellule muscolari lisce, stimolate dagli stessi lipidi ossidati che inducono aterosclerosi, sono in grado di trans-differenziarsi in osteoblasti e, successivamente, di produrre osso mineralizzato nella parete arteriosa. Inoltre, sia il processo di aterosclerosi che di osteoporosi vedono il reclutamento dei monociti e la loro differenziazione in macrofagi-cellule schiumose nelle arterie e negli osteoclasti dell’osso (5). Il processo di trans-differenziazione in senso osteo-condroblastico delle cellule muscolari lisce della tunica media delle arterie vede coinvolto un aumento dell’espressione del fattore di trascrizione Runx2 e di altri mediatori a valle di differenziazione osteoblastica (Msx2, Wnt3a, and Wnt7a), di mineralizzazione della matrice (osterix, fosfatasi alcalina) e proteine tipiche del tessuto osseo (collageno tipo I, osteocalcina, osteopontina, e RANKL) (6).